embracing integrity in their job without

Category: Literature,
Words: 1669 | Published: 01.15.20 | Views: 315 | Download now

Writers, Books

Get essay

Ayn Rand, Fountainhead, The Fountainhead

Integrity is a quality regularly sought after although rarely achieved, once attained, it is more rarely managed. It is an hard-to-find gem with all the potential to motivate and change a person. Unfortunately, it is usually compromised – a valuable payment for something of reduced value- whether it be wealth, prestige, or social standing. This kind of odd yet common exchange is shown in Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead, and it is explored inside the context of architecture. Initial, the concept of integrity is portrayed through Henry Cameron or in other words that this individual maintains his integrity yet is destroyed by world due to his uncontainable enthusiasm. Second, Philip Keating and partner Person Francon willingly substitute not only their own honesty, but regarding their structures in exchange for wealth and recognition in contemporary society. Finally, Howard Roark is unaffected by and prevails over the relatively destructive and menacing society all although maintaining his most treasured possession: his honour. Being demonstrated over the novel, culture despises passion, devotion, and individuality, and can often take a look at nothing to eliminate any touch of it. Yet , Cameron and Roark reveal an understanding essential for true greatness: it is not simply commendable, but desirable to become hated by society, because in becoming so , the precious gemstone of ethics has been endured.

Holly Cameron – though an architectural genius – is seen as a commercial failure among societal members. In essence, his unstable career as an you is spent introducing the supposition to society it is more remarkable to be a business failure while keeping genius, instead of sacrificing genius for the sake of sociable success. Essentially, Cameron battles for sincerity in a dangerous society. The corruptor on this society – Ellsworth Toohey – assures the public to hate Cameron on the basis of poor architectural expertise. However , Cameron’s only problem is that “he love[s] his work” (46), and comes with an unbridled love for it. Consequently, his love is evident in his complexes, and screams in the looks of passersby. Ultimately, Henry Cameron’s function is enthusiasm, it is integrity, and fearlessness. Subconsciously, society hates Cameron j. for the only reason that his early on buildings have the ability to achieve what they cannot: genuine honesty and uprightness. In truth, “men hate passion, any kind of great passion” (45) leading to them to deny Cameron’s personal portrayals of passion. Yet , armed with Toohey’s excuses of ungodly structures, society hide these emotions of insufficiency by condemning Cameron’s job. Cameron admits to Roark that “thirty years of a lost cause” (64) is definitely not as intimate as it appears, and in a point in time of repent, warns him to follow a different sort of path stating “accept all of them, Roark. Bargain. Compromise today, because you’ve got to later, anyway” (62).

Ultimately, inside the moments of his job that Holly Cameron is most obsessed with his work, he’s most successful. However , once his target strays coming from his love to the threatening public, his career steadily collapses. He begins not just in see all of them, but to fear them and the hatred, the population condemnation of Cameron, brings about the decline of Cameron. This fear is expressed when he demands Roark “do you ever before look at the people in the street? Aren’t you afraid of them? inches (64). Next, Cameron admits that he fears they, and in expressing “the element of them is usually hatred for just about any man who loves his work” (64) he is disclosing the reason this individual has been ruined by the people. Only when he begins to acknowledge and dread the people, is this individual overcome. Therefore , though Cameron recognizes that it is desirable to become hated by society with regard to integrity, his fear of the masses lead to his damage.

By contrast, for Philip Keating great advisor Guy Francon, their particular greatest dread is certainly not sacrificing all their integrity, although being disliked by culture. As a result, Keating and Francon readily surrender their honour for sociable popularity. Just like a beggar so desperate for funds he brings anything, such is Keating and his desire for a respectable social ranking. Contrary to Roark, who will not compromise his integrity with regard to social acceptance, Keating compromises his probe, interests, and even the love of his life-Catherine-in exchange intended for prestige and false respect. The admiration given him is false, because those who know of his sleazy escapades do not esteem him whatsoever. This determination to exchange ethics for summary, worthless belongings is the important difference which places Keating and Francon in an totally different spectrum than Cameron and Roark. Just as the public hates Cameron’s buildings because they are honest and upright, Keating resorts to despising Roark because he signifies everything that Keating never was. Peter promises that “it [is] not required to wonder about the reasons. That [is] important only to hate, to hate blindly, to hate patiently, to hate without anger, only to hate, and let absolutely nothing intervene, and never let oneself forget, ever” (194). Inspite of this assert, the reason for his hatred is evident – just as guys hate love, they also hate integrity, for this is a unique treasure that so quickly vanishes. Inspite of his contempt for Roark, after years devoted to appealing to the insatiable public, Keating finally recognizes the truth: that hatred coming from society in the interest of integrity is not only the most decent result, however the most attractive. In declaring “I i am a parasite. I’ve been a parasite all my life” (575) Peter Keating admits that he is really poor, intended for even the things he offers gained have remaining him clear. He verbally affirms the futility of all he provides strived to get when he says “I desire a prestige We don’t are worthy of for a great achievement We didn’t attain to save a name We haven’t gained the right to bear” (575). Gradually, societal appreciate for Peter Keating just becomes a prompt to him of his readiness to sacrifice sincerity, and he begins to desire their hate instead.

The internal tug-of-war between interpersonal acceptance and maintaining integrity that Keating struggles with throughout his career is definitely not widespread in the lifestyle of Howard Roark. In fact, it does not actually exist. In contradiction to Keating, Francon, and even Cameron, Roark does not consider the opinions of society whatsoever, moreover, he claims he does not see all of them, saying “but I certainly not realize the people inside the streets” (64). His presence inch[makes] them feel that he [is] not generally there, or perhaps that he [is] and they [aren’t]inches (62). It truly is for this reason that Roark can overcome the hatred of society and ultimately become not only an imaginative and meaning success, yet also a commercial success – a accomplishment which Cameron j. does not accomplish. Instead of worrying their disregard, Roark embraces it, viewing it as being a commendable and desirable result, because it shows his finest accomplishment: his relentless honesty. Unlike Keating, Roark builds entirely with regards to building, and doing so, his own honor and uprightness are described in these set ups. As is the case with Cameron’s buildings, culture chooses to reject these people because that they confidently and unashamedly symbolize passion and integrity – qualities that almost all people no more possess. Roark establishes in the conversation with Austen Likas? that “a house can easily have ethics, just like a person…and just as seldom” (136), demonstrating that his buildings will be the essence of what person should be. Contrary to Cameron, who have fears the masses and the capabilities, Roark expresses his distaste for them strongly, stating “do you not know that many people take the majority of things because which what’s provided them, and so they have no opinion whatever? inches (165). It truly is in this way that Roark and Cameron vary dramatically: although they the two recognize honesty as a need that must be maintained, Roark prevails over the hate that owns society merely by refusing to acknowledge it while an barrier. Success just exists in case it is recognized as achievement. Failure only exists whether it is declared as such. In the same way, the masses are only an barrier if they are acknowledged as one. Roark refuses to find society while an opposition, therefore – until it straight interferes with his work in the case of the Cortlandt Homes – he will not view it since an adversary. Instead, world represents exactly what Howard Roark does not want to be: dishonesty, problem, and compromise. Realistically, in the event that one was adored simply by people in whose morals contradict one’s personal morals, this current lifestyle can be questioned. Consequently , if Roark is detested by a group of people which means such defective standards, this is simply not a downfall, but an fulfillment, for this individual has continual his integrity.

In summary, characters such as Howard Roark and Holly Cameron display that contempt from contemporary society is not only meritorious, but it also desired. For in receiving hatred from people who so readily compromise their particular honour, personal integrity is re-established. This really is demonstrated by various character types throughout the novel, such as Henry Cameron who – although managing aid his personal integrity – is demolished by a contemporary society whom he fears. It can be contradicted simply by Peter Keating and Dude Francon, who have represent those in culture that only realize too late that integrity is definitely one’s most precious ownership. Finally, Howard Roark may be the image of this kind of ideal when he not only prevails over the world in the pursuit of integrity, nevertheless becomes a ethical, artistic and commercial success. In brief, honesty is not only humanity’s most valuable possession, but it is usually the most powerfulk, for simply by fighting to maintain its lifestyle, honesty, real truth, and a faultless globe are also fought for.

< Prev post Next post >