the significance of contradiction in eryximachus

Category: Philosophy,
Words: 994 | Published: 04.09.20 | Views: 619 | Download now

Philosophical Works

Get essay


Through each of the speeches from the Symposium, Eryximachus’ speech could be the most difficult to understand. Looking at Eryximachus’ initial, more scientific way of love, below which this individual views appreciate as something which can be quantitatively measured, 1 many find it difficult to accept a lot more abstract arguments of a “universal” love that he poses later on in the speech. Thus, one can request: Why does Plato present such a stunning, almost contrary, set of arguments within Eryximachus’ speech?

The first portrayal of Eryximachus reveals him to become a man of science. From the very onset of Eryximachus’ presentation he commences with the declaration, “I truly feel sure is actually from treatments, my own area of expertise that I have realized awesome and wonderful a the almighty Love is definitely, and how his power reaches all of man and keen life. inch These terms indicate a person who evidently takes pride in the occupation in medicine. This kind of “pride” in his occupation then simply continues to present itself in his pursuing arguments. While shown in the statement, “Love is not only stated in the mental responses of human beings to beautiful persons, but¦ inside the bodily replies of every kind of animal, in plants growing in the earth, inch Eryximachus’ pleasure in remedies is displayed in his faith to the idea that take pleasure in can be viewed, and so explained, in terms of medicine and science. This “scientific” perspective is supported by the fact that Eryximachus’ assertions imply that he believes that love is actually a quality that could be quantitatively assessed. This is noticed in his terms “bodily responses” which supports the idea that Eryximachus believes that he can bodily view and acknowledge the presence of love in every living things.

Another important facet of Eryximachus’ presentation is seen inside the very nature of the presentation itself. Because Eryximachus’ presentation is so distinct from the different speeches, it is clear that Plato uses this disagreement as a rendering of a very specific method to view take pleasure in. This tactic is observed in the fact that Eryximachus’ talk uses a disproportionate number of personal pronouns”the terms “I” and “my””which facilitates the idea that Plato clearly would like to distinguish Eryximachus’ speech from that of the other heroes by showing to the viewers that Eryximachus, himself, feels his presentation to be unique to the additional speeches. In addition , Eryximachus’ first words, “This is what I believe, ” also provides another layer of separation among his speech and the various other speeches by simply stating the most obvious and asserting that what he is about to say regarding love is completely original. From the beginning, this separation between Eryximachus’ speech and the other messages helps offer a clear visual of how Eryximachus thinks, allowing for readers to compare and contrast this line of reasoning having a different one in Eryximachus’ next argument. Eryximachus’ following argument portrays an extremely different idea from the argument prior. After speaking of the quantitative aspects of love, Eryximachus asserts an even more abstract and philosophical discussion, one that contends that take pleasure in is a widespread force. Eryximachus’ statement, “When those elements I mentioned before (hot and cold, dry and wet) are motivated by the well-ordered Love, they can be in a harmonious relationship, ” supplies a glimpse of the idea that love is far more than the “bodily response, ” but instead a general force that rules the balance between contrary forces. This “universal” view of love is usually shown in Eryximachus’ statement, “So Take pleasure in as a whole has great and mighty”or alternatively total”power, at the time you put this kind of all together, inch which portrays Love to end up being an omnipotent and all-encompassing power. In addition , the fact that the word “Love” is capitalized hints at the concept Eryximachus sights Love being a god, a view that adds to the more “abstract” and spiritual basis of his new discussion.

After reading the entirety of Eryximachus’ talk, one cannot help but to be mixed up. After all, Plato presents a striking dichotomy between Eryximachus’ arguments. Similarly, Eryximachus generally seems to adhere to the scientific approach, on the other, Eryximachus seems to basic his definition of love on philosophy. Actually these incredibly contradictions undermine Eryximachus’ presentation rather than enhance it. So just why does Plato present Eryximachus’ speech in this manner? Perhaps, Plato is concerned with an idea past the topic of like. By giving these kinds of contrasting landscapes of love, Bandeja subtly shows his watch of the relationship between science and idea. The very shorting of Eryximachus’ speech as a result of two viewpoints reflects Plato’s view that science and philosophy will be incompatible. Perhaps more interesting is the fact that because Eryximachus’ is a technological man simply by trade, Escenario is also saying the superficial nature of science in it’s comprehension of abstract characteristics such as love.

This kind of negative look at of Eryximachus by Escenario is seen inside the pompous characterization of Eryximachus’ character. For instance , Eryximachus’ affirmation, “I truly feel sure is actually from treatments, my own specialization, that We’ve realized awesome and fantastic a god of love is¦, ” reveals Eryximachus being someone who consistently tries to help remind everyone that he is a doctor, despite the fact that it is clear that the other heroes already know that he can a doctor. Is it doesn’t very weak spot of Eryximachus’ speech that explains to the audience that men who base their particular views entirely off scientific research are incapable of understanding take pleasure in and other beliefs through the accurate way of viewpoint. Plato, therefore , may have created this dual-faceted argument to be able to establish the concept it is beliefs, not scientific research, that is able to answer the genuinely important queries in life.

< Prev post Next post >