38790242
Journal Quotation List Hull, H. G. (2009).
THE NOT-SO-GOLDEN YEARS: WHY HATE CRIME LEGISLATION IS FAILING A WEAK AGING POPULACE. Mich. St L. Rev. 387. Recovered from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Wang, L. (2000). KNOWING OPPORTUNISTIC PREJUDICE CRIMES. eighty B. U. L. Add some opuch. 1399. Retrieved from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Taslitz, A. E. (2000). HATE CRIMINAL OFFENSES, FREE CONVERSATION, AND THE CONTRACT OF COMMON INDIFFERENCE. eighty B. U. L. Add some opuch. 1283. Gathered from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Ginsberg, A. (2011).
Hate Is Enough JUST HOW NEW YORK’S BIAS OFFENCES STATUTE OFFERS EXCEEDED THEIR INTENDED SCOPE. 76 Brooklyn L. Rev. 1599. Retrieved from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Schafer, J. R., Navarro, J. (2000). HATE UNMASKED: A PRACTICAL VERSION FOR UNDERSTANDING AND COPING WITH HATE GROUPS. 21 Chicano-Latino L. Add some opuch. 5. Gathered from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Martin II, S. Ur. (1994). ESTABLISHING THE CONSTITUTIONAL USE OF BIAS-INSPIRED BELIEFS AND EXPRESSIONS IN PENALTY ENLARGEMENT FOR HATE CRIMES: WISCONSIN v. MITCHELL. 27 Creighton L. Add some opuch. 503. Recovered from www. exisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Jacobs, J. B., Knitter, K. A. (1997). Hate Crimes: A vital Perspective. twenty-two Crime, Simply. 1 . Retrieved from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Ainsworth, T. N. (1993). TARGETING PERFORM: A CONSTITUTIONAL METHOD OF PENALIZING HATE CRIMINAL OFFENSES. 20 Fordham Urb. D. J. 669. Retrieved coming from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Ryan, E. (2006). CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION CHAPTER: M. HATE CRIMES AND HATE SPEECH. six Geo. J. Gender, D. 679. Recovered from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Kalam, M. (2000). Hate Crime Prevention. 37 Harv.
J. about Legis. 593. Retrieved coming from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Gratett, R., Jenness, V. (2001). EXAMINING THE BOUNDARIES OF HATE CRIMINAL OFFENSE LAW: AFFLICTIONS AND THE “DILEMMA OF DIFFERENCE. 91 J. Crim. T. & Criminology 653. Retrieved from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Scotting, Capital t. A. (2001). Hate Criminal offenses and the Need for Stronger Government Legislation. 34 Akron T. Rev. 853. Retrieved coming from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic MacNamara, B. H. (2003). NEW YORK’S HATE CRIMES WORK OF 2k: PROBLEMATIC AND REDUNDANT LEGISLATION AIMED AT SUBJECTIVE MOTIVATION. six Alb. L. Rev. 519. Retrieved by www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Taslitz, A. E. (1999). Condemning the Racist Personality: How come the Authorities of Hate Crimes Guidelines Are Wrong. 40 N. C. D. Rev 739. Retrieved from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Sampson, M. H. (2000). Federal Hate Crimes Legislation EXPERT: The problem of hate offences demands national intervention, taking with this increased knowledge and solutions. 26 San Francisco Att’y twenty-four. Retrieved coming from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Wang, L. (1997).
THE TRANSFORMING POWER OF “HATE”: SOCIAL EXPÉRIENCE THEORY PLUS THE HARMS OF BIAS-RELATED CRIMINAL OFFENSES. 71 S. Cal. T. Rev. 47. Retrieved coming from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic O’Keefe, K. W. (2010). SAFEGUARDING THE HOMELESS UNDER PRONE VICTIM SENTENCING GUIDELINES: AN ALTERNATIVE TO INCLUSION IN HATE CRIMINAL OFFENSE LAWS. 52 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 301. Retrieved coming from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Agyemang, T. (2006). RECONCEPTUALIZING KID SEXUAL FERMAGE AS A TENDENCY CRIME BENEATH THE PROTECT ACT. 12 Cardozo J. M. & Sexuality 937. Retrieved from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Lawrence, F.
M. (2003). THE NEW INFO: OVER-REPRESENTATION OF MINORITIES IN THE CRIMINAL PROPER RIGHTS SYSTEM ARTICLE: ENFORCING BIAS-CRIME LAWS WITH OUT BIAS: EVALUATING THE DISPROPORTIONATE-ENFORCEMENT CRITIQUE. sixty six Law & Contemp. Prob. 49. Gathered from www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic Grattet, 3rd there’s r. & Jenness, V. (2005). THANKING OUR REVIEWER: ARTICLE OF GENERAL INTEREST: The Reconstitution of Regulation in Community Settings: Firm Discretion, Ambiguity, and a Surplus of Law inside the Policing of Hate Crime. 39 Legislation & Soc’y Rev. 893. Retrieved by www. lexisnexis. com/hottopics/lnacademic
