achilles and odysseus essay

Category: Contemporary society,
Words: 1815 | Published: 12.02.19 | Views: 550 | Download now

Unrest and war

It is not unknown that folks look up to heroes and even try to emulate their very own actions; nevertheless , there is a relevant question that needs to be asked in order to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of what differentiates a hero”from somebody who is merely preventing for him self. According to Aristotle’s National politics (9), inches[¦ ] he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient to get himself, need to either be considered a beast or maybe a god: he’s no element of a state.

 Although it may not seem to be rather apparent, but this specific line in Aristotle’s National politics tacitly signifies that men whom possess incredible characteristics and goals, including heroes could be compared to both gods or perhaps wild animals. Considering they are heroes, they do not need the accompanied by a other individuals (self-sufficient) and are detached from other community, they are really not totally different from wild animals.

While it can be said the epic heroes discussed from this particular critique have written for their particular time and place, it is necessary to look at how they could contribute, and whether such contribution, indeed, was a thing deserving of reward and adoration.

In the event one is to analyze Achilles and Odysseus because of Aristotle’s philosophy, it could be realized that there is much more into a hero than simply defeating his adversary. There is also a difference using what makes a person a hero, a goodness, and a beast.

Debate: The Assessment Between Achilles and Odysseus According to John Miles Foley’s A Companion to Ancient Legendary (77), an evaluation between Achilles and Odysseus is vital understand not only Ancient greek language epic, nevertheless also the idea of a leading man and his relationship to his community in a “specific historical time and place (Foley 77). The difference between these two heroes is that whilst Achilles’ individuality is monolithic, Odysseus’ individuality is many-sided.

It is also noticed in the Iliad and the Journey that “while Achilles defines his impressive supremacy as being a warrior, Odysseus achieves his own kind of epic superiority in an alternate way, as being a master of crafty stratagems and cunning intelligence (Foley 79). If perhaps one is to adopt Aristotle’s line regarding heroes as wildlife into consideration, it will probably be seen that Aristotle might actually have a logical point, specifically owing to the very fact that Achilles’ anger was your main cause of the countless challenges the Greeks encountered as they pursued their very own war with all the Trojans (Foley 79).

In respect to Robin the boy wonder Sowerby (247), although Achilles is considered an amazing hero, that is not remove the fact that he had recently been a compulsive hero, who had been not able to control his anger, thus, her endangered not only him self, but also his family and his individual country. His stubborn frame of mind in doing what he wished resulted, then, in fatalities and further suffering.

It is not unfamiliar that Achilles had an excessive amount of pride, horrible temper, and resentment that has been boiling deep within him, all of which may possibly have clouded his judgment (Sowerby 247), thus, limiting him from properly performing as a part of a team during the war. He fought intended for himself and he fought against on his own; nevertheless , “it is by no means easy for one man to superintend several things; he will have to appoint a number of subordinates (Aristotle 74) to get a job performed properly instead of doing anything on his own.

Obviously, Achilles’ irrationality, temper, and desire to wipe out his attacker alone had been his disadvantages. If is to analyze Achilles’ characteristics in Aristotle’s viewpoint, these is the reasons to look at this hero because either a beast or a our god; although it would appear as if Aristotle would be bending toward the description that Achilles was obviously a beast, rather than a god.

It should be understood that to Aristotle, everyone has their own position within a state, within a community, and if an individual chooses to not make up to his duty”and prefer to become disagreeable and stubborn just like Achilles instead of working with additional individuals toward a common target of the community, then he could be not element of that community, and therefore, he or she must either certainly be a beast or a god. But once one is to assess Achilles because of Aristotle’s discussion, it is just logical to say that Achilles had been a hero who had been more of a beast than a the almighty.

According to Aristotle (73), “passion pervs the heads of rulers, even when these are the best of men.  This statement is specially true, if perhaps one properly analyzes Achilles’ character. His temper wonderful pride has made him perform horrible errors that may not be undone. His passion, his will becoming a warrior, to prove that he was strong and he can carry out everything by himself without the help of other persons, eventually corrupted him and resulted in disaster.

Odysseus, on the other hand, is the polar opposite of Achilles. In respect to Douglas Olson’s Blood and Iron: Stories and Storytelling in Homer’s Journey (52), even though he is prominently known as the guy who tried to save his fellowmen and dismally failed and returned home empty-handed, the wrong doing must not be related to him. It is known the sailors he wanted to retrieve to their homes perished during their journey home”but not mainly because Odysseus was a bad innovator and he was unable to handle the responsibility.

It must be clear that their own death was their own fault; all their wrongdoings had to be punished. This is an developing theme in the Odyssey and must not be incorrect for a inability of this particular Greek leading man. In evaluation, if Odysseus were a careless leader because people produce him to be able to be due to the deaths from the sailors, then simply he would be unable to lead his country properly as a good ruler. In fact , prior to event that they can had to travel and leisure by sea, Odysseus experienced proven to be a very responsible head to his crew.

The moment his men were starving, instead of sending them out to hunt when they were tired, he be sure to let them sleep and did the hunt himself for his men. Having been able to destroy a stag and taken it to their camp to ensure his guys to be able to consume a feast the following day (McCaughrean 32). While it may seem like he was just like Achilles who also wanted to do things on his own, Odysseus was several in the sense that he wished to look out for these people, and believed that they well deserved to rest their tired systems, so he let them, and hunted meals for them.

Having been merely operating the way a leader should toward his followers, compared to Achilles who wanted to work exclusively and often exposed people around him to irrational explodes of state of mind. In Odysseus’ tale, there is no Hector to be defeated”only sailors who are bad and Penelope’s (Odysseus’ wife) suitors who flocked around her if they presumed that Odysseus was already dead. Even though Odysseus had to be cunning to be able to overcome challenges, his tale was mare like a fight with rules and probe rather than a battle with swords and shields.

Of course , it is mainly debatable as to whether which is the far more difficult battle, nevertheless regardless of which is more difficult, the point is that in contrast to Achilles who also preferred to work alone and declined to be a very good leader, Odysseus was to the job and understood what it meant to be an innovator to his people. Odysseus cannot be considered a our god, for this individual knew what it was to live in a culture; he realized that he needed other people despite his qualities as a hero, he was willing to business lead his persons, as well as deal with and sacrifice for them.

Summary As noticed in the aforementioned discussion, Achilles and Odysseus acquired their own approaches to fight their particular battles. Whilst it is given that arguments will arise to whether such legendary heroes did the appropriate way to win their very own battles, it cannot be refused that Aristotle made impression when he explained that “desire is a outrageous beast (Aristotle 73). It might not seem much to a lot of people but such a simple phrase contains a large truth that cannot be prevented.

Individuals who allow themselves be absorbed by way of a desires often find themselves poor in creating moral decisions, for desire often seduces man in to doing what he wishes and not what he should. As observed in the evaluation between Achilles and Odysseus, one must ultimately request: Who is the better main character? Who is the beast? Do they offer a god? There may be Achilles whom fought and won intended for himself, intended for his desire to kill his adversary, designed for his people, whereas there may be Odysseus, who also failed to take his males home, nevertheless he tried to lead all of them the best way this individual could.

Whilst Achilles was obviously a beast, it cannot be declared Odysseus was obviously a god”for Aristotle’s statement was undeniable: to be part of a society, need to one find out one’s place. It is not regarding self-sufficiency, it had been about helping each other and knowing which will position for taking and fill out. A real main character, apparently, can be not the main one who may not be likened to a god, to get he is not self-sufficient, and he needed others; not can the true hero end up being likened into a beast, for he would not merely fight for himself”he fights for others.

The hero is definitely the one who attempted, failed, yet, was still in a position to lead his people forward. Works Mentioned Aristotle. Governmental policies. South Dakota: Nu Vision Publicationas, LCC. Print. Foley, John Miles. A Companion to Old Epic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Printing. McCaughrean, Geraldine. Odysseus. New York: Oxford University Press, the year 2003. Print. Olson, Douglas & Homer. Blood vessels and Straightener: Stories and Storytelling in Homer’s Odyssey. The Netherlands: At the. J. Brill, 1995. Printing. Sowerby, Robin. The Augustan Art of Poetry: Augustan Translation from the Classics. New york city: Oxford School Press Incorporation., 2006. Printing.


< Prev post Next post >