ambassadors essay
Mavromati Panayiotis Karafotias IREL-480-9 Pertaining to my paper I decided to publish about the ambassadors of Denmark, The usa of America and Uruguay. His Excellency Mr. Mary Norring, the ambassador of Denmark, was one of the ambassador’s to come this session. He chosen to focus his speech certainly not on his country but even more on the global financial crisis and how it affected Ancient greek language economy. He said that even without the crisis the situation in Greece could have been unpleasant.
Despite the fact that Maastricht Treaty enables the GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT deficit in European countries only 3% Greece had shortage 6-7%.
Minister plenipotentiary said that in 2006-2007 the federal government of Kostas Karamanlis were able to restrain the deficit towards the acceptable level, but after in 08 they failed. Karamanlis expected that he’d be reelected and this individual promised to restrain the deficit, but people shed faith in him. Later on George Papandreou revealed the modern information about the debt. The shortfall for that time was not 8% but 12%.
And thus the save program was established by the European Union. So Greece took program to the EU and the IMF. They needed a hard cash and the EU and IMF tried to aid in it. Then this restructuring finance was established.
The population expenses had to be cut. Since ambassador said “Greece offers one of the biggest public administrations plus the cutting of public sector expenses will help to decrease the shortfall. He also pointed out that 25% of Ancient greek economy is definitely black economy. The only one point which he said about his country was that the Denmark is not fault Eurozone. A primary reason I enjoyed the conversation of Danish ambassador was because he appeared very honest when talking about the topic. When giving his speech, he gave personal examples and continuously reported the audience.
The 2nd ambassador was your ambassador of Uruguay, his Excellency Mister. Jose Luis Pombo Morales. He chose to focus his speech on his country and its relations with Greece and other European countries. Mr. Jose Luis Pombo Morales, talked about politics system in Uruguay, that it must be arepresentative democraticrepublic with apresidential system. Likewise, he advised us that, the associates of government will be elected for the five-year terms by auniversal suffragesystem. Uruguay is aunitary state: rights, education, overall health, security, international policy, defence are all implemented nationwide.
The Executive Power is practiced by thepresidentand acabinetof 13 ministers. Additionally to that, Mister. Ambassador talked about Uruguay among the biggest made of woll and meat exporter towards the EU countries. Mr. Jose Luis Pombo, told the audience, that Uruguay is one of the most economically designed countries in South America, which has a highGDPper capita and the 52nd highestquality of life indexin the world. Uruguay is rated as the 2nd least damaged country inLatin America(behindChile), although Uruguay scores considerably greater than Chile about domestic polls of file corruption error perception.
It is political and labour circumstances are the highest level of freedom on the region. The third delegate, I want to discuss, is the delegate of the United States of America, his Excellency Mister. Daniel Jones. Ambassador centered his talk on Greek- Turkish contact and financial crisis. His conversation was incredibly diplomatic, and tried to retain neutrality, once some college students asked him questions about problems in Libya and Greek-Turkish conflicts. But , Mister. Smith, gave very clear thought, about the united states and its overseas relations. Likewise
You may also be interested in the following: minister plenipotentiary essay test
1
