anthem simply by ayn seite essay

Words: 1928 | Published: 12.25.19 | Views: 725 | Download now

Imagine a world where the individual continues to be repressed to the point which the

word My spouse and i no longer exists. Now, as hellish as that sounds, imagine that you

will be the only one who have the capability in order to free from the iron fists that

happen to be choking you and your friends. This is the your life of Equal rights 7-2521, the

principal personality and narrator of Ayn Rands Anthem. Anthem happens in

the dark ages of the future, within a totally collectivized world. This kind of culture has

regressed to conditions reminiscent of Ancient Greece and the European Dark

Age ranges. In the midst of fear and subordination, one guy stands alone. Equality

7-2521 is usually not like his brothers. He is able think, create and defy. This will make

him extremely dangerous. He holds the threat of change in his hands fantastic

government will minimize at not take that from him. Equalitys society

represses him since they are afraid of those that threaten the established

buy. One major catalyst for change is intelligence. Equality displays data

of guru at a new age. We, Equality 7-2521, were not happyin the

House of the Learners. It was not that the learning was way too hard for us. It

wastoo convenient (Rand 16). In Equalitys society, it truly is evil to get different

from ones siblings, let alone to get better than they can be. He is trained at an

early age to be embarrassed with his intellectual superiority. This is a sin, to be

given birth to with a head which is as well quick (Rand 16). This product of reductions by

way of shame utilized in an attempt to stifle geniuses and, hence, calm his

societys fear of change. As Equality grew, this individual confirmed their very own fears. During

his life-time he made many revelations and discoveries. His most outstanding

breakthrough was his re-invention of electrical power. We, Equal rights 7-2521, include

discovered a new power of character. (Rand 54). He produced a simple light

light. He wanted to use his invention to raised his universe. To the bad luck of

his society, they will loathed the brand new power. If they happen to have accepted his ideas

Equality would have been the exacto and radical bringer of light (Gladstein

43). Unfortunately for Equality, and his world, his breakthrough met

chaotic opposition fantastic brothers are not able to benefit from his

intellect. Genius provides historically recently been repressed. Geniuses of our previous have

recently been ostracized, punished, and martyred for offering ideas that eventually

bettered their communities. Equality is not a different. Equality 7-2521 is a

creator and inventor inside the tradition of Galileo, Edison, and Einstein (Gladstein

27). These real life geniuses dared to violate their societys norms and

eventually their particular ideas were accepted. Similar to Equalitys fictional culture

real-life societies include tended to ignore the concepts of simple geniuses

(McDonald 2). His ideas were swept apart violently, wonderful society remained

unchanged. Self-interest leads to the defiance of unjust limitations.

Equalitys federal government prohibits individual action. No one is permitted to do

whatever on their own. You cannot find any transgression blacker than to consider or

do alone(Rand 11). Equalitys defiance of his governments laws and regulations set him

apart from his brothers. The condition of the Building of Corrective Detention is

demonstrative with the unquestioning obedience of his brothers. It is easy to

escapethere will be no guardsThere is no reason to have guards, for a man have

under no circumstances defied the Councils so far as to escape via whatever place they were

ordered to be (Rand 73). Contrary to his brothers, Equality acquired the individual

power to go against the laws of his government. Simply by questioning specialist he got

an interest per se and was liberated. The noblest human purpose is to

pursue enlightened self-interest and later those the follow that course can easily

emerge aschampions (McDonald 2). Equalitys authorities had attempted to

contain him from day one. Authorities cannot control him because he has an

independent brain. This fully collectivized culture has no electrical power

the individual(Branden 112). His self-interest permits him to do something

as individually as his surroundings could permit. Even though he is educated by

his self-interest, he’s never clear of the shackles of remorse his contemporary society has

placed upon him. No matter how freethinking Equality is definitely, his character is still

formed by his society (Kelly 1). On the other hand this guilt did not end him by acting

individually and frequently challenging the laws of his culture. Creativity can be

a main staple needed for change to take place. Equality has somehow

had the opportunity to escape the suppression of creativity that is so deeply ingrained in

his tradition. Equality is usually not the sole person who will be able to transgress as a way

to create. One among his siblings, International 4-8818, is a normal artist and is

punished in an attempt to stifle his talents. These were not appreciated because

theydrew pictures and theymade guys laugh (Rand 27). Their particular government

totally prohibits this type of creativity. It is just our brothers in the

House of the Artists who are permitted to draw pictures(Rand 27). Also

though the two men, Equality and Worldwide, are very skilled and intelligent

they are both assigned to be road sweepers amongst pale boy with half a

brain(Rand 17). These men had been kept coming from sharing their particular gifts with the

society. Their very own society feels that those skillsets need to be suppressed in order

to preserve the proven state with their society. They are really correct in this

assumption. Imagination and individualism inevitably lead to change.

Individualism was the creative power changing the world (Branden

12). Repression of creative imagination and individuality are a best way to inhibit

social change. Devoid of creativity Equalitys society will not be improved

since the self-creative can improve society (Kavanagh 1). A collectivized

society cannot benefit from that which the particular independent head can

create (Branden 112). Unless a society can accept and embrace creative imagination

it will continue to be unchanged. Equalitys society is incredibly afraid of inquiry.

They are petrified of anyone who is able to problem and challenge what they

are taught. Equality 7-2521 is definitely perceived as a threat to the established

order (Gladstein 35). Equality was ostracized, reprimanded, and practically killed

intended for presenting a thought to the Council of Scholars. His interest in the

scientific globe had led him into a monumental discovery: electricity. Having been

able, through experimentation, to know this new force, and this individual eventually

constructed a old fashioned light bulb. Equal rights had confident himself that his

breakthrough discovery was so excellent that if he would have been to present it to the Authorities of Scholars

all his transgressions would be pardoned and his invention would be embraced. He

gives it towards the council just to arouse fear and hatred in the hearts of the

scholars. The line glowed. But terror hit the men from the

Council(Rand 78). This intense fear of new ideas experienced led the Council of

Scholars for taking measures to stop these types of discoveries to be of

the common man. Children had been taught for a young age not to issue their

surroundings. The Authorities of Scholars reports that there are no

mysteries(Rand 18-19). This type of clampdown, dominance causes the society in order to avoid

the reality of their situation (ONeill 85). As opposed to his parental input and

the laws of his federal government, Equality is able to question. They can think

which includes degree of freedom. He is able to maneuver beyond the shackles of his

limited education(Gladstein 27). Because he was created with outstanding

intelligence, he was able to break free and be his own person. In conclusion

Equal rights 7-2521 can be feared as they has the capability to make main social

transform. This capability lies in his supreme intellect, self-interest, defiance

and the capability to question. Dread is the actual cause of most of Equalitys

challenges. His society is afraid of change plus they know that he’s capable of

revolutionizing their particular world because they know it. This kind of results in Equal rights being

terrifying and regarded as a risk. Their dread evolves in hate and in addition they want to

shut Equality down. Their very own intense fear of Equality practically leads to his death.

Nevertheless , Equality also had the strength to break clear of the organizations that experienced

bound him his whole life. He risked his pride, his safety, and his your life and

was rewarded with freedom. A large number of words have been completely granted in my experience, and some will be

wise, and several are fake, but only three happen to be holy:? Let me it! ‘(Rand

109).

Bibliography

Branden, Nathaniel. Who is Ayn Rand: An Analysis with the Novels of Ayn Rand.

New York: Randomly House, 1962. Gladstein, Mimi Reisel. The Ayn Rand Companion.

Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984. Kavanaugh, Steve F. The Triumph of Ayn

Rand. America 3-10 July 99: 1-2. Kelly, David. Capitalism: The Unidentified

Ideal. Reason December 93: 1 . McDonald, Marci. Fighting Over Ayn Rand: A

Radical Individualists Followers Cannot Get Along. U. S. Information and Universe

Report being unfaithful March 1998: 1-5. ONeill, William Farreneheit. With Charitable organization Towards None: An

Examination of Ayn Rands Philosophy. Totowa, NJ-NEW JERSEY: Littlefield, Adams & Co.

1977. Flanke, Ayn. Anthem. New York: Signet, 1946. Functions Consulted Branden

Nathaniel. Who may be Ayn Rand: An Examination of the Novels of Ayn Rand. New York:

Random House, 1962. Gladstein, Mimi Reisel. The Ayn Rand Partner. Westport

CT: Greenwood Press, 1984. Kavanaugh, John Farrenheit. The Triumph of Ayn Rand.

America 3-10 July 1999: 1-2. Kelly, David. Capitalism: The Unknown Suitable.

Reason Dec 1993: 1 ) McDonald, Marci. Fighting More than Any Rand: A Significant

Individualists Enthusiasts Cant Go along. U. S i9000. News and World Report 9

Drive 1998: 1-5. ONeill, William F. With Charity Towards non-e: A great Analysis of

Ayn Rands Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1977. Rand

Ayn. Anthem. Nyc: Signet, 1946.

< Prev post Next post >