brett anderson essay
English pd. 9
Compare/ Contrast
11/25/98
The Keys to a Superb Story
What certain characteristics are necessary to create an excellent literary work? Why is one
work impossible to place down when another operate is difficult to stay focused upon? There are several
important elements essential to make good work outstanding. These kinds of key elements will be: interesting
characters, an challenging plot, a valid theme, and a thoroughly structured bottom line. These are the real key
elements of a literary operate that I will focus on and explicate to suit your needs.
The heroes in Observe for the Prosecution happen to be believable throughout the authors vibrant
descriptions and through what Mr. Mayherne says about the heroes during his interviews with
them. For example the author defined Romaine as a foreign female with high cheekbones, heavy
blue-black locks, and a nervous twitch in her hands that may be distinctly overseas. The narrator went on to
say she actually is a strange, quiet woman, who is so quiet that she made visitors feel uneasy. The author can be
also very in depth with her description of Mr. Mayherne. The narrator depicts him as a small precise
guy, who is efficiently dressed and recently got his footwear shinned. She also said the most striking
attribute of Mr. Mayherne is usually his shrewd and pointed gray eye. From his brief come across with
Mrs. Mogson, we found out that she was scared with sulfuric acid by Romaines boyfriend and has
been bent about getting vengeance on Romaine. Plausible character types and brilliant description makes story
better and add towards the plot in the story.
Mcdougal of Wine beverages was extremely non-discriptive regarding the character types. This lack of description
makes the characters extremely difficult to associate too. The writer never also gives her characters
labels. She merely refers to them as a person and women. This total lack of fine detail makes it hard focus
around the story and quite often you find it easy to lose sight of what is happening inside the story.
The plot to get Witness to get the Criminal prosecution is clear, reasonable, and well-defined. The plan mainly
contains Mr. Mayherne and Romaine trying to get Mister. Vole aquitted of the charges that this individual killed
Emily French. One of the most interesting turn of the plan in this account is that Romaine lied for the jury to get
Mister. Vole aquitted of the charges.
By contrast there is not any real plan for wine beverages. The man and woman are sitting for a cafe intended for no
evident reason talking about their first kiss. The man tells the facts to the woman about his first kiss
and your woman gets annoyed with him. I thought this was an interesting level of compare because in Witness
for the Prosecution Romaine lied and received the court case for Mr. Vole, in Wine the person told
the reality to his wife and was bullied and teased by her.
The concept of the Wine and Witness intended for the Criminal prosecution almost apparently directly contradict
each other. The theme foe wine may be the truth may be painful sometimes, whereas the theme intended for Witness
pertaining to the Prosecution is that liars do not usually get caught. The theme intended for Wine was hard to
understand, since the woman gets upset on the man to get no apparent reason when he tells the reality.
The idea in Experience for the Prosecution is easily understood because it is clearly spelled out in
the conclusion of the story.
The conclusion of Wine is incredibly unclear, badly developed, rather than focused. This leaves a lot
of unanswered questions in the readers mind. This achievement never tells the reader what happens
to the few or for what reason the woman is usually mad at her partner. The only thing the reader learns using this
conclusion would be that the wine your spouse and partner are drinking will remind them of their youth. This kind of
opaque summary only increases the lack of goal in the tale.
The conclusion of Witness for the Prosecution is very centered, well developed and it jewelry
up all the lose ends of the history. The completing this account reveals that Romaine is disguised since
Mrs. Mogson and it had been Romaines false testimony that got her husband aquitted of his murder
expenses. The conclusion with the story explains to the reader exactly what Mr. Mayherne knew and draws
a great ending into a great secret.
After cautiously contrasting the important thing elements in Wine and Witness pertaining to the Prosecution it
is becoming apparent that Witness intended for the Criminal prosecution contains the attributes necessary of your great
fictional work. Wine beverages is lacking too many of the important thing elements vital in making a good literary
work. The differences between two both the stories makes Wine challenging to stay focused upon
because it is short of many of these essential areas. While sporting many of these key elements well
produced throughout the tale makes Observe for the Prosecution, among those stories which might be
truly a enjoyment to read.