capabilities and competences

Category: Scientific research,
Words: 443 | Published: 12.27.19 | Views: 751 | Download now


Pages: 1

Capability-based strategies derive from the notion that internal assets and key competencies derived from distinctive capabilities provide the approach platform that underlies a firms long lasting profitability. Analysis of these functions begins with a company functionality profile, which will examines a companys strengths and weaknesses in 4 key areas:

  • Managerial
  • marketing
  • financial
  • technical

Then a SWOT evaluation is carried out to determine if the company provides the strengths essential to deal with the actual forces in the external environment. This examination enables managers to identify:

  • external threats and opportunities, and
  • Unique competencies that may ward off the threats and compensate for weaknesses. The picture determined by the SWOT analysis helps to suggest which kind of approach, or tactical thrust the firm will need to use to gain competitive benefits.
  • Stalk, Evans and Schulman (1992) have discovered four concepts that serve as guidelines to achieving capability-based competition:

  • Company strategy would not depend on items or marketplaces but on business processes.
  • Key strategic techniques are required to consistently give superior worth to the customer.
  • Investment is created in ability, not functions or SBUs.
  • The CEO need to champion the capability-based approach.
  • Capability-based strategies, at times referred to as the resource-based perspective of the company, are dependant upon (a) those internal resources and functions that provide the platform for the firms technique and (b) those solutions and capabilities that are the principal source of profit for the firm. The management function is to recognize what reference gaps should be filled in in an attempt to maintain a competitive border where these capabilities are required.

    Several levels could be established in defining the firms overall strategy platform (see figure). At the bottom in the pyramid are the basic methods a firm provides compiled with time. They can be grouped as technological factors, competitive factors, bureaucratic factors, and financial elements.

    Core competencies can be explained as the unique mixture of the resources and experiences of any particular firm. It takes a chance to build these types of core expertise and they are challenging to imitate. Critical to sustaining these core competencies exist:

  • Strength their life is for a longer time than person product or perhaps technology life-cycles, as are lifespan spans of resources used to generate them, including people.
  • In transparency it is difficult for rivals to imitate these expertise quickly.
  • Immobility these capabilities and resources happen to be difficult to copy.
  • < Prev post Next post >