colonialism inside the tempest and research

Essay Topics: Colonial time,
Category: History,
Words: 1361 | Published: 12.31.19 | Views: 455 | Download now


Get essay

The Tempest, Migration, Miranda Rights, Othello

Excerpt from Research Newspaper:

This individual notes that “anticolonialist critics have sought to “demystify the countrywide myths” of empire and also to write another solution history of the colonial encounter” by focusing on “the politics of the early modern English-Native American encounter” with a great eye to “moments of textual break and contradiction in early contemporary texts like the Tempest” (Cefalu 85). You can identify the scene of Prospero’s accusations as one this kind of moment, as well as Cefalu examines Caliban thoroughly, albeit regarding his financial status as a colonized person, rather than his racial or perhaps ethnic position. According to Cefalu, Caliban “learns not just one, but two languages in the play []: the chinese language taught to him simply by Miranda is definitely the language of your natural economy and precapitalist values; the language he internalizes by the end of the play (one that this individual teaches himself) approximates the language of instrumental labor and capital” (Cefalu 106). Cefalu still views Caliban because the positionnement of colonial time discourse in The Tempest, although focuses on the economic colonization represented via Caliban’s character rather than the ethnicity or cultural tensions which can be embodied by Prospero’s colonialist bigotry.

Cefalu’s interpretation is very important because it provides some context for the consideration of Caliban and Prospero presented here. Bigotry and racism is hardly ever an end itself, but is pretty is most frequently deployed as a method of justifying the atrocities committed with the intention of an siguiente ideology, and this case (and much of colonial time history) the specific ideology dished up by bigotry is capitalism. Thus, Cefalu’s analysis will not contradict the assertion that Caliban and Prospero’s marriage is predicated on cultural hostility and colonialist stereotypes, but rather points out that their combative relationship ultimately will serve capitalism’s purpose.

In contrast to Cefalu’s interpretation of The Tempest, Patricia Geesey’s evaluation of Season of Migration to the North challenges this kind of essay’s consideration of Mustafa Sa’eed, describing him as “a ethnic hybrid, the resulting children from the colonial time union of Great Britain as well as the Arab-African nation of the Sudan” who problems with developing either cultural identity in his psyche, rather than a purely vengeful figure embodying the colonial concerns over Great Britain (Geesey 129). In her dissertation “Cultural hybridity and contaminants in Tayeb Salih’s Mawsim al-hijra ila al-Shamal (Season of Immigration to the North), ” Geesey notes that “for many scholars, Mustafa Sa’eed’s very own self-comparisons to Othello make it difficult to not see in his character a man who fidèle vengeance upon British colonizers of the Sudan through his sexual intrusions with ladies in London, inch but suggests that “it is a blunder to imagine the conflict between Sa’eed and the British women is definitely indicative with the colonial conflict played away between The african continent and The european union, ” mainly because “to view Sa’eed’s sexual conquests as being a colonized person’s vendetta is usually to fall into the trap of cultural stereotyping that is at the same time Sa’eed’s system of attraction against the women and ultimately his own downfall” (Geesey 129).

Though Geesey admits that the “multilayered traditional, cultural, fictional, and economic relationships by play involving the Arab/African globe and American Europe” symbolized in the story support numerous readings, the lady does not consider the aforementioned meaning of Sa’eed as valid. The problem with this declare, however , is that in her brief evaluate of the “vengeful colonized person” interpretation, Geesey fails to separate Sa’eed and the novel on its own. As mentioned just before (and as i have said by Geesey! ), Sa’eed enacts social stereotypes specifically for deploy all of them as “weapons of attraction, ” and so one simply cannot consider Sa’eed’s character with out acknowledging how these stereotypes define Sa’eed. Thus, viewing “Sa’eed’s lovemaking conquests being a colonized individual’s vendetta” does not force one to “fall into the trap of cultural stereotyping, ” but instead allows that you consider how Sa’eed, by himself falling into the trap of cultural stereotyping, allows the novel as a whole to actually challenge those stereotypes.

As you will remember, this variation between character and story was made earlier in this essay, because it is necessary acknowledge to be able to understand how the stereotypical representations of Caliban and Sa’eed function in different ways in possibly text. In The Tempest, Caliban is symbolized almost completely unsympathetically, plus the colonial overtones serve to enhance the stereotypes used to rationalize colonialism and its attendant atrocities. Caliban’s greatest transgression, attempting to have sex with Miranda, signifies the patriarchal colonial low self-esteem and dread regarding the colonized person’s libido and effectiveness, and the inhuman characterization of Caliban just serves to intensify this fear. In Time of year of Migration to the North, however , Sa’eed intentionally embodies cultural stereotypes, rather than becoming described in those conditions by other folks, as Caliban is, and this is done to explicitly concern those stereotypes. Thus, whereas Caliban’s outwardly applied portrayal can be viewed as a strictly colonialist act, Sa’eed’s internalization of colonialist stereotypes can be seen since an positively anticolonialist action, even if that ultimately does not achieve Sa’eed’s desires.

The complex romance between colonizer and colonized has been a central focus in critical operate regarding equally William Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North, and the two texts cope with this marriage in specifically different ways. Inside the Tempest, the smoothness of Caliban is described in the language of the Western european colonizer and represented while something less than human, undeserving of pity and widely exploitable. He could be accused of attempted rape as a means to further diminish virtually any right he has to his home, and following this accusation he is made subservient to Prospero, the embodiment from the “civilizing” colonizer. The play is largely sympathetic to the colonizing force plus the fact that Caliban’s greatest transgression is to strive a coupling with Miranda demonstrates the colonizer’s anxiety about colonized householder’s sexuality and potency. For the reason that Tempest can be read like a colonialist textual content, this dread is never totally realized, as well as the colonized person is ultimately rendered impotent and harmless, freed by the cruelly magnanimous Prospero. The character of Mustafa Sa’eed in Season of Migration to the North, however , represents a type of inversion of the very cultural stereotypes applied to Caliban. Sa’eed symbolizes the very fear of sexual ability expressed by simply Prospero, but in this case the colonizer is usually incapable of forestalling the colonized person’s lovemaking conquests. In fact , Sa’eed embodies this fear to the end, so that not only does he couple with multiple United kingdom women, but he eventually causes their deaths resulting from this coupling, either directly or indirectly.

Instead of providing only like a terrifying different, similar to Caliban, Sa’eed is deployed inside the novel as a method of displaying the ineffectiveness of participating in stereotypes as a method of struggling with those extremely stereotypes. Sa’eed imagines that his execution might eliminate the rest he symbolizes, but in the final he is simply able to reaffirm this lie. Thus, while Season of Migration for the North utilizes some of the exact same cultural stereotypes as The Tempest, it will so for almost the opposite purpose, and the persona of Sa’eed allows the novel to implicitly fight those stereotypes of colonialism.

Works Cited

Cefalu, Paul A. “Rethinking the task of colonialism in economic terms: Shakespeare’s The

Tempest, captain John Smith’s Virginia narratives, as well as the English response to vagrancy. inches Shakespeare Studies. 28. (2000): 85-119. Print.

Geesey, Patricia. “Cultural hybridity and contamination in Tayeb Salih’s Mawsim al-hijra ila al-Shamal

(Season of Immigration to the North). “Research in African Literatures. 28. three or more (1997): 128-140.


Salih, Tayeb. Period of Migration to the North. New

< Prev post Next post >