community health proposal essay

Category: Health and fitness,
Words: 1366 | Published: 12.26.19 | Views: 766 | Download now

The aspects of community and mixture are closely connected and people tend to utilize the terms reciprocally. The best way to clarify the difference between two principles is by examples to separate and obtain a clearer knowledge of the difference involving the two ideas. This daily news will define aggregate and community providing an brief support from current literature. The paper will also examine and offer the differences involving the two terms plus identify and recognize the picked aggregate based upon the health issue of heart problems.

Get essay

The Christoffel’s three levels of a conceptual framework to get advocacy will be described. After that each stage as a great aggregate chosen is referred to.

Community and Aggregate Conditions Defines

In community health care nursing, aggregate is described as the whole populace, which is being used to describe the environment. The word aggregate is employed to refer or perhaps define a group of people in a world who are believed to have comparable or common problems and challenges in their life.

These people should reveal similar attributes and also they should be living in similar area. The group to be described should be experiencing the same medical or medical problem and should be in search of comparable medication or perhaps health care providers. Aggregate in nursing placing literally is described as the entire, entire, or the sum of a provided group with similar problems, (Nies & McEwen, 2010).

Dissimilarities Between Get worse and Community

You will find those people who make use of the term community when talking about aggregate. Get worse and community are two different concepts but are closely connected. Community in nursing health care setting is used to relate to the standard population within a given area. A community is a entirepopulation that features the sick and tired and healthier population. When ever discussing regarding the aggregate, all of us refer to the population, which is encountering a health condition along with individuals who are responsible of taking care of the group that are sick. The complete population that comprise of healthier and sick and tired in the culture is referred to as the community, (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2009).

Identified Get worse and Description as a health Issue

You will discover those people who use the term community and the term aggregate to refer to the same thing or to mean something the same. There stand significant dissimilarities between the term community as well as the term mixture. When we look at aggregate, our company is referring to a population, containing similar medical problems or challenges and live in similar region or perhaps geographical area. For the city, it’s the general population that requires the sick and tired and those who also are not unwell. In this case, Adults suffering from cardiovascular disease in The state of illinois is a great aggregate human population that is used to define the present health care challenges. In the condition of The state of illinois, specifically the Sangamon region community, data shows that heart disease is the number one reason for loss of life of adults in the whole state of Illinois and Sangamon county (Illinois Department of Public welfare [IDPH], 2010).

Christoffel’s Three Levels of a Conceptual Framework for Advocacy Christoffel’s three periods for advocacy include data, strategy, and action. The stages occur concurrently. The first stage, information, involves naming, talking about, and computing the public health issue. The second stage, strategy, requires using the data in the 1st stage to build up a plan of action for the campaign of public health. The level includes. This stage involves the conversation of information towards the public and health care experts. Groups can then be assembled to focus on the issue and plan necessary changes. Strategies can include general public education emails, campaigns, and press meetings. This action may involve account raising, convincing individuals to alter their lives, and laws involvement.

To obtain action, changes in mindsets, behaviours, and useful resource provision. Public welfare advocacy transpires at two levels: the individual/family level and in the larger community level (Christoffel, 2000). Advocacy that focuses on the interpersonal or intrapersonal level is frequently termed as patient advocation. Patient advocation involves any “activity that benefits a patient (Torrey, 2010). It can apply specific patient treatment, groups that develop plans, and guidelines changes to improve the health care program for individuals. There are many examples of patient advocation organizations, which include government groups such as the Middle for Disease Control, American Heart Association, and person patient recommends who work as healthcare co-workers (Torrey, 2010).

Applying Every single Stage because an advocate for the combination

The first level in the Christoffel’s advocacy framework talks about the information factor. The knowledge names, explains, and steps the public health problem. When discussing the issue of cardiovascular disease. This level can be used to illustrate the disease method, the risk factors involved, and it is complications. Within this stage, the private sector or the federal government sector become involved so as to develop the research necessary that can be used to measure the public health problem. Data shows that this stage is pertinent simply because this assists develop all record information and results that are suitable in order to talk about the advocacy challenge. The first stage in Christoffel’s advocacy framework is to develop a research upon heart disease in the society. This stage will help develop relevant information on the mortality charge related to cardiovascular disease and/or their complications (Christoffel, 2000).

The other stage in Christoffel’s care framework may be the stage of strategy. Having collected relevant information about the trouble of healthcare issue, the second stage helps work on the data so as to be familiar with problem totally. In this stage, the central idea is to become results that will assist come up with a lot of strategies approach approach the health problem. Experts in particular fields convert the research studies so that correct results are produced to develop an agenda of actions (Christoffel, 2011).

The third stage in Christoffel’s advocacy structure is the level of actions. Strategies, that are developed inside the second stage on how to take care of thehealth concern are integrated and supervised in the final stage of Christoffel’s care framework (Christoffel, 2011). It really is alleged that when strategies in stage two are applied and monitored they provide the best results in value to the health care environment, (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2009). Public well-being messages on the news and paper prints can help inform the community regarding heart disease. Additionally, there are local medical doctors who provide free learning seminars in specific disorders. Raising money to help with campaign actions can also be integrated during this level. Legislation could be educated for the health issue to convince coverage makers to get involved. The key part of this stage is definitely action. The goal is usually to influence people to change certain habits that may reduce the likelihood of developing heart problems.


The facets of community and aggregate happen to be closely linked, and in most cases a lot of people are likely to use them interchangeably. These two conditions are used reciprocally, but they will vary meanings. You will find those people who use the term community and the term aggregate to refer to the same thing or to indicate something precisely the same. There stand significant dissimilarities between the term community plus the term mixture. Aggregate is the populations that has similar health issues and are seeking similar health care services, however the community may be the entire population that bears the sick and the healthier. The use of Christoffel’s advocacy construction helps resolve a problem with respect.


Christoffel, K. (2011). Public welfare Advocacy: Procedure and Product. American Journal of Public well-being Illinois Department of Public welfare. (2010). Leading causes of death, Illinois, 2010. Retrieved via Nies, M. (Mary Albrecht), & McEwen, Meters. (2010). Community/public health nursing: promoting the healthiness of populations. Elsevier/Saunders Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2009). Foundations of nursing in the community: community-oriented practice. Mosby/Elsevier


< Prev post Next post >