educational heritage of war essay

Category: Essay topics for students,
Words: 2953 | Published: 12.26.19 | Views: 411 | Download now

I remember developing up and playing various video games as a young child. Several of these video games had been extremely violent games, games in which my friends and I can learn how to control a gun and kill opponents. In addition to prospects games, I remember seeing advertisements for videos in the cinema that were chaotic movies filled up with scenes of fighting and defending oneself against the enemy.

However, I suppose I used to be brought up to view war as being a mediocrity in society. This is exactly what Clarence Karier seems to discuss in his lecture on the educational legacy of war, about the lessons warfare has educated us.

Karier begins his spiel by explaining how contemporary society has a false belief in the myth about America becoming a peaceful nation. He continually list the many wars that our country has been a witness to throughout the nineteenth century, as well as throughout the twentieth century.

Essentially, Karier is trying to convey to the market how America has indeed been in your constant battle, and is not truly a peace-loving nation. Intended for if America were a classic peace-loving region as we claim to be, we would not discover our state and nationwide governments in great financial debt because of armed forces expenditures. We also may not have to experience the fact that America moved from finest creditor region to best debtor region in the world, and all within our lifetime too.

As Karier continues upon through his lecture, this individual states the second fable is the opinion that warfare is short-term.

He explains just how once we experience war, we can never really ever before return house, for those disturbing times of war are forever in the memories of the soldier and the community as well. Karier himself describes war being a heightened undemocratic experience in living from which much is learned. (Karier, 4) The lessons of war happen to be taught towards the living, they are found in each of our behavior long after the firearms have halted firing and these lessons are destructive to a democratic society.

The fundamental notion of battle is that the end justifies the means.

However , in war, we all routinely break civil legal rights and simple human rights to life. Consequently , these undemocratic methods of battle result in undemocratic ends. Battle cannot for that reason secure democracy. However , the American people seem to think that it can, for they have been relatively tricked in believing therefore.

We’ve been taught that we are a peace loving nation and that we just engage in war to defend ourselves.

Karier takes his lecture in explaining just how things such as available propaganda had been effective in gaining the consent of the people to enter into war. However , what the many the American society does not realize is that the government provides control over press and has the strength to say what can and can not always be released intended for public know-how. They can use it as a manipulating device to obtain the approval of the people to announce war on one more nation.

They attempt to get the general public to imagine the American destiny to rule the world and have brought up American society on activities such as western frontier movies where cowboys battle to gain the frontier that may be theirs. They may have raised society on additional movies too, which teach the public to simply accept the lawfulness of the

National Secureness State. Not only have films done this, but video gaming as well, educating our youth about battle and planning them to end up being future military.

Karier continues in the lecture to describe how firms, such as the CIA have been a manipulating application in contemporary society, keeping different things ” inside info ” from the community.

They have the power to control the mass media, such as tv and newspaper publishers. They can use advanced schooling as a means of going about their particular operations, generally experiments, which include ones about controlling minds. The thing that is unusual about all of that is how the American people have arrive to accept this kind of secrecy of the government plus the principle the end justifies the means. What most of the people do not realize is that our Nationwide Security Point out has been really destructive to the democratic beliefs, traditions and institutions.

Karier comes to the final outcome that the most significant legacy of war is perhaps the education with the American people, which has taught our American society to accept the goal of universe empire and believe that the National Security State is absolutely essential for American security. However , it is a fact that because of secrecy and the federal government hiding certain information from your public, the American fantasy for democracy has been forsaken. As Giambattista Vico explained..

. the world of civil society has undoubtedly been made simply by men, which its guidelines are as a result to be found inside the modification of your own human minds. (Karier, 28-29) That explains flawlessly how the government, or the guys according to Vico, provides truly built society what, they have made their own history by controlling what the people know and dont know.

The issue theory perceives the sociable world in continual struggle.

A conflict theorist would basically see war as a frequent struggle between competing groupings. Conflict advocates also believe people are truly shaped by power, coercion, and specialist. Therefore , they would strongly support the theory the government has made society by controlling what is known by the American people. The us government has used its power to change the mass media and provides kept issues from the general public about conflict and other armed service issues.

The CIA has had 400 (and now possibly more) American journalists working for them. This proves how they include great electricity over the open public, for they may control what is going to be printed in magazines and journals. It is evident how they condition public thoughts and opinions because of activities like CIA Director William Casey buying controlling desire for Capital Cities Marketing communications Inc., which will held a controlling involvement in ABC, which will linked the CIA Overseer with HURUF.

Through activities like that, the CIA can control what information is usually broadcast towards the public. Through controlling the mass media, the most misleading information the fact that government offers given the American community is probably the perception that America is a relaxing nation. They may have complete power over what we learn about war scenarios, they can create panic and hatred towards another nation if they wish to, or they will simply conceal information and leave the in finish ignorance. During the Gulf Conflict, they allowed the release of stories about Iraqi troops tearing Kuwait babies from other incubators.

This caused uproar with all the public and caused a large number of to become angered, creating a feeling of nationalism in specific hatred and yearning pertaining to war.

The CIA has used universites and colleges for clandestine operations and possess conducted various experiments upon unknowing U. S. college students.

For instance , at the University of Rochester, drugs including LSD were experimented with, making it easy to deduce that the pass on of LSD on campuses in the 1950s and 1960s was directly the effect of those CIA experiments. That brings up the topic of whether the end truly justifies the means. The CIA conducted a lot of experiments to ascertain how to start brainwashing persons, similar to what communists acquired done. They will left various people with long lasting brain harm and severe personality disorders.

Really does that end truly justify the means? Many people would concur that it absolutely does not.

It is hard not to question a defieicency of the CIAs involvement with drug trafficking as well. Ever since China droped and support was flown by Air flow America to Burma, the U. T.

have been involved in the drug business. Flying drugs coming from secret surroundings bases helped the CIA to pay for their very own secret battles, such as the ones in Laos back in the sixties. Throughout Unites states war in Central America, our country became engaged not only in forearms deals yet drug trafficking too. The wide spread and use of medicines in contemporary society soon became a huge issue for America and beneath the Reagan Supervision the slogan Just say no to drugs! was introduced.

Again, in this instance, does the end justify the means? Will do a huge medicine problem, nonetheless present in America today, warrant drug trafficking to pay for conflict expenses? Many again could agree this certainly does not. The sociable world is in fact in regular struggle, that may be how a conflict theorist would look at it. The social tendencies, or the government use of medication trafficking, can easily best be understood with regards to conflict, they

make use of the drug money to pay for battle expenditures, wars which are fought with competing groups, or simply stated, various other countries which might be in competition with America.

Contrary to the conflict theory, is the ever-present functionalist theory, a theory believing that every part of world contributes to its survival.

The functionalist theory highlights the way that parts of a society will be structured to maintain its balance. If an aspect in society would not contribute to the stability or survival, than it does not serve a useful function or showcase value opinion among members of a culture and therefore are not passed down from a single generation to another. It is easy to see how war has become passed down via generation to generation and contributes to the survival of society through offering reliability. Therefore functionalists would declare war will serve a function in society.

They would probably say that conflict serves the function of preserving the National Protection State, it serves as a way of prevention of the opponent. They might even say that battle serves as a method of creating nationalism and patriotism within America.

Functionalists also think that people are socialized to perform social functions. Take for example movies and video games that Americans have been subjected to look at and perform.

From the time the American belief of Manifest Success in the 19th century, America has been lifted with imperialistic teachings. We all fight for what ever we think is definitely ours, and indeed are one of the most violent countries in the world. Just take a look about and you will observe how our junior has been raised with finding

assault on the streets, as well as on tv. They have been permitted to play with doll weapons and play game titles in which that they learn to use weapons and kill their particular enemy.

In Kariers lecture he covers how 1 military innovator even mentioned how the Government had been looking forward to a era of soldiers who had been brought up on game titles so that they would be more comfortable and efficient with using modern weapons in war. That is certainly sad, although so best shown. Today it is rather easy to see how so many youngsters are being socialized to be looking forward to their options contracts as American soldiers. These kinds of games and images children observe in the movies and television shows and video games have truly recently been sources of these kinds of socialization.

Once again, we see the return to that notorious question, does the end genuinely justify the means? Will need to we really become subjecting children to these kinds of violent pictures just to enable them to be better willing to be soldiers to defend each of our country? A large number of people will say certainly to that issue, however , We find that it is far from necessary to have such procedures.

So why should innocent children be trained to be confident with violence? On the contrary, they should most importantly be taught how to always be peaceful, not really taught to become comfortable with taking action against the enemy then be told is about America being a peace-loving nation. Maybe that is the root of one of our nations most significant problems. Rather than raising our kids to make serenity, we prepare them for war.

We claim to be one thing, peaceful, however fail to really be it, in that case teach our kids to claim that same thing, all over again fail to educate them how you can be it. Does that not seem to be odd?

Through Kariers lecture we find that the most significant legacy of war have been the education of the American persons. That education has taught us to take the goal of Globe Empire and believe National Security Condition is absolutely important for American protection. However , should not we change our educational approach? Rather, shouldnt we all begin to educate America tips on how to truly become peaceful people and not just admit we are? This way, if we genuinely learn to become peaceful persons, we will not have to worry so much about our Nationwide Security Point out.

I find it so frustrating that these times, instead of viewing children be the traditional ghost or witch for Halloween, we see these people dressing up as ninjas and Great Morphin Electrical power Rangers. Functionalists would probably notice how today violent and aggression of children provides often recently been correctly caused by television viewing. Television is definitely not the only source that such patterns can be discovered, but is among the most prevalent sources available to children numerous in the United States. That socializes children in a way, setting up them because of their futures because soldiers against enemies.

But how exactly does television browsing cause children to learn these militaristic behaviors of being even more violent, intense or anti-social?

Research have shown that television violence affects kids by desensitizing children towards the horror of violence, educating them to agree to violence being a solution to challenges, teaching those to imitate the violence they will see on the television and leading them to identify with character types seen on tv. The amount of physical violence in television programming is obviously directly relevant to the amount of violence witnessed simply by

children. In 85 alone, 85% of all television set programming comprised violence, with 92. 1% of cartoons aired that contains violence.

These cartoons generally have one violent act every three a few minutes! (Liebert and Sprafkin, 117) While cartoons are often viewed as innocent very safe for children to watch, with this sort of rampant assault in all of them, are they genuinely safe and innocent?

Any individual watching just one violent tv program can be more hostile, in kids, this trend is also applicable. In reality, children are more troubled by television than the average mature. Children who watch chaotic television development, especially encoding in which the violence or aggression is practical, frequent and/or unpunished are likely to become more violent and extreme, immediately after this program and/or later, sometimes even years later.

One of the most troubling areas of tv set and kids involve the types of programs kids seem to be observing.

For instance , one of the most well-known television shows in the 1990s, Mighty Morphin Electricity Rangers, is practically entirely occupied with employing violence to fix the various concerns the heroes must confront. Additionally , these kinds of characters happen to be praised rather than punished pertaining to using assault to solve their very own problem(s). Consequently, the audiences learn that violence is an acceptable option, while likewise not learning any other find solutions to problems techniques. In fact , according to recent exploration, childrens courses are the least likely of genres (of television shows) to show the long-term adverse consequences of violence.

(5%) (http://www.cep.org/tvviolence.html) Clearly, kids watching television all over America are learning to adopt violence

often the incorrect solution to any difficulty.

Hence, what different can we expect from them whenever they bring the assault and aggressiveness into the community, such as within their own universities?

Concerning each of the events, which have occurred within the past month, it truly is imperative that individuals begin with our nations kids and instruct them how you can be peaceful, for they are our expect the future. If we continue to allow them to view and participate in chaotic things, they will never arrive to know this is of peacefulness. Instead, they will begin to become accustomed to finding acts of violence as normalitys within our society, begin to view events such as the September 11, 2001 terrorist acts as just another day-to-day act of violence. What an even greater misfortune that would be if we allowed that to happen, therefore it is crystal clear that we must change our view on the academic legacy of war.

It is an important action we must take in in an attempt to change and be able to honestly say that we are a peaceful nation.

Phrases

/ Web pages: 2, 719 / 24

< Prev post Next post >