ethical decision making research paper

Essay Topics: Crystal clear, Insurance Company, This scenario,
Category: Personal concerns,
Words: 822 | Published: 01.10.20 | Views: 224 | Download now

Ethical Decision Making

Get essay

Ethical Concerns, Ethical Issues, Ethical Dilemma, Decision Making Procedure

Excerpt via Research Newspaper:

Ethical Decision

Ethical Dilemma and Decision Making

In the selected scenario, a therapy patient is usually beginning to produce a trusting relationship with his specialist after spending a fir amount of time dealing with his depression. Under-employed and under-insured, it is crystal clear that the individual still requirements help but it is less crystal clear that this individual has the necessary resources to keep paying for his therapy. Insurance payments could be guaranteed by simply embellishing his mental state slightly, as a result allowing the therapist to receive payment and providing the care required, but are these claims proper? This paper is going to apply the fourteen stages in the ethical decision making method to get an answer.

The standard situation with the ethical situation is whether or not it really is ethically appropriate to statement a more significant mental state to the patient’s insurance company to keep receiving repayment for providers he evidently needs. Basically, is it good to lie in order to get support for someone; do the ends rationalize the indicate?

Step 2: The consequences of a decision in cases like this will be far more far-reaching than might at first be believed. In addition to affecting the patient, the therapist, and the insurance provider, trends in the over-reporting of certain mental conditions simply for insurance purposes could lead to much bigger if simple problems intended for the insurance and mental well being industries and society as a whole. On the other hand, consistently failing to supply necessary attention due to lack of payment abilities will also have far-reaching outcomes for all get-togethers concerned.

Step 3: There are multiple clients from this scenario, which can be part of the explanation the honest dilemma is really complex. The individual is clearly the primary client, however the insurance provider is in some ways a customer of the therapists as well – they have a agreement (explicit or implicit) when the therapist is usually held towards the honest functionality of his duties in terms of making insurance claims/billing.

Step 4: Knowledge in this field likewise also comes in several spheres, and thus the amount of expertise plus the amounts of absent knowledge that effect the various aspects of this problem vary significantly. It is without a doubt that carrying on to receive treatment is in the best interests of the client and that continuous to be paid out for providers is in the curiosity of the specialist, and it is very likely that the money from insurance can be disbursed without significant impact for the insurance company. Even more knowledge is necessary in to the economic aspects of the truth, but therapeutic knowledge and skills may not be expanded much in a manner that could have a real effect on this scenario.

Step five: Formal honest standards as well differ in their commentary on this case, at times in mutually exclusive manners. The tenets of your utilitarian moral viewpoint may likely suggest embellishing the mental condition in so that it will keep rendering services for the patient, because this would give you the greatest very good without leading to any noticeable harm (or arguably any kind of harm at all) towards the insurance company. Specialist ethical standards, however , and also other ethical devices, would insist that this kind of dishonesty is never warranted, regardless of the outcome is definitely expected to always be.

Step 6: The relevant legal criteria are quite straightforward in such a case: while practitioners are certain to provide the best possible care they can for their sufferers, falsifying data regarding a mental state is unquestionably unlawful. No matter what the reasoning, the specialist would certainly be seen guilty of a great infraction in case the “embellishment “came to be regarded by relevant parties.

Step 7: Research in this area exists, although not necessarily especially relevant. Destruction that can be done to many of these society simply by not treating depression is undoubtedly extensive, nevertheless placing elevated burdens in insurance companies plus the health sector for solutions that are unnecessary or that cannot be taken care of also makes problems (and the insurance business decides precisely what is “necessary” depending on what the affected person can pay pertaining to the insurance). None of them of this impacts your decision of whether or perhaps not the ends warrant the means in this case.

Step 8: There is a clear self-interest on the part of the therapist in both decisions that can be made in this scenario – embellishing the condition has a immediate monetary benefit for the therapist, allowing for

< Prev post Next post >