ethics and morality integrity is analysis paper

Essay Topics: 2010 coming, 2010 http, April 2010, Point view,
Category: Values,
Words: 1201 | Published: 02.10.20 | Views: 295 | Download now

Morality And Ethics

Get essay

Values And Morality, Integrity, Legal Ethics, Integrity

Excerpt from Research Newspaper:

Because this point of view emphasizes a balance of pleasure over pain, it might approve activities which are generally considered immoral.

The Perspective of Self-Interest:

The Self-Interest point of view requires the exclusive expression on the long term consequences associated with an action to oneself. According to this point of view, an action is recognized as right or perhaps essential if it maximizes the individual’s happiness. Yet , the quest for self-interest will not exclude a person from performing actions which benefit others. It’s logical for someone to behave in the interest of others provided that what he/she truly does will also take happiness to him/her. It must be noted this perspective will not encourage the performance of selfish actions. As opposed to the self-interest perspective, self-centered actions usually encourage the pursuit of self-interest at the price of others.

The Principled Point of view:

While both benefit and self-interest views judge rightfulness of an action by its ability to create positive outcomes to one or more persons, the principled perspective deems a task right as long as it can be understood as an action to be used freely by simply everyone. When using this perspective, the first step will be to describe the action into consideration. This consideration captures the circumstances of the action and what an individual intends to do.

In contrast to both the profit and self-interest perspectives, the principled perspective judges a task right or wrong not by the satisfaction or soreness it creates but simply by its reasonableness and consistency. If a alternative is responsible for an individual to carry out, it is therefore responsible for all others to perform it in the same circumstances. Even though it offers a procedure for identifying which actions are correct and wrong, reflection simply by principle will not offer a means of determining commitments when a single must choose from two contradictory actions or obligations. The guidelines of real reason do not include each of the dynamics of moral thinking (Haien, 2002).

Decision-making Processes in Ethical Sincerity:

In maintenance of moral sincerity a person’s personal choice of actions is required to comply with all sound reasons and logical guidelines that people generally use to evaluate behavior. There are numerous decision-making techniques that exist in deciding a moral concern. Each of these procedures, which are connected to the rules of integrity includes:

Application of the Three Perspectives:

This is the first step in the decision-making procedure in ethical integrity. The aforementioned three views are to get the uses of featuring us with means of making distinctions between our activities. The generalization used by each perspective in deciding right and incorrect must be the innermost account for decision. Moreover, the occasional discomfort for what one of many perspectives believes right holds a hint to the inevitability of employing all three viewpoints together. The combination of three perspectives reflects the complete meaning reasoning. The usage of one perspective overlooks the other viewpoints which will uncover numerous options, information and direct focus on the whole pallet of decision. The application of these kinds of three views also helps a person to choose the best decision possible.

Resist Rationalization and Irresponsibility:

The other step in the decision-making method in ethical integrity involves resisting rationalization and irresponsibility. Occasionally, an irresponsible decision can be not generally a matter of oversight although instead very deliberate and made in bad beliefs. When this happens, a person has usually decided how to proceed in advance of applying any meaningful decision unit. The uses of rationalizations always distract one from the obligation to pick wisely. The most potent rationalizations are: everyone does it, they don’t understand, is actually not my personal problem at the. t. c.

On the contrary, the use of the three points of views enables someone to withstand rationalizations. This is because the perspectives forces person to question if the rationalizations or excuses fully reflect the way in which people will judge his or her motivations plus the extent of his/her requirements.

Asserting the Moral Points of views:

This is the third step in the decision-making process in honest integrity and it is very important for the individual is definitely confronted with the irresponsible ethical decisions of others or when ever others try to influence the person into wrong actions. In many cases, the three meaning perspectives act as the powerful tools and reminders to influence reconsideration, defend meaningful position and refute the demands of unethical behavior.

Attention to Critical Information:

The three meaning perspectives provide a structure that allows people to more confidently discover all their obligations actually in instances which need timely decisions on nominal information. The absence of this sort of a structure for managing our thoughts is likely to result in a situation wherever people are overwhelmed by the scale of a meaning decision. The reasoning techniques of the three perspectives present guidance for people to understand if you should act, what information to do something upon, tips on how to preserve the advantages of ethical reflection and how to rationalize decisions.

In conclusion, the three meaningful perspectives function as both the practical obligations in ethical sincerity as well as the equipment which shape the decision-making processes in ethical ethics. As mentioned, moral integrity is simply based on someone’s internal convictions, the unstated norms within an organization or society and what the society considers while right or wrong habit.

References:

Gert B. (2008, February 11). The Definition of Morality. Gathered April 12, 2010, by http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/

Haien JA. (2002, March 5-10). Maintaining Honest Integrity – the Rules of Engagement.

Retrieved April doze, 2010, coming from http://www.accts.org/ministries/ethics/latvia/Papers/haient.htm

Phil cannella B. (n. d. ). The Definition of Morality and Ethics: Phil cannella for Mankind. Retrieved Apr 12

2010, from http://www.philforhumanity.com/The_Definition_of_Morality_and_Ethics.html

Richard (2005, July 9). Society and Morality: Beliefs et cetera. Retrieved April 12, 2010

coming from http://www.philosophyetc.net/2005/07/society-and-morality.html

“Ethics” (n. m. ). Answers. com: The World’s Leading Q A Site. Retrieved The spring 12, 2010, from http://www.answers.com/topic/ethics-legal-term

“How do I Maintain my Integrity” (n. d. ). What do you Stand for? Recovered April 12, 2010, by http://www.scribblers-ink.com/work_ethics.html

“Values and Ethics” (n. g. ). Proper Leadership and Decision Making: Nationwide Defense

College or university. Retrieved 04 12, 2010, from http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/strat-ldr-dm/pt4ch15.html

< Prev post Next post >