features of the servant management model

Essay Topics: Servant leadership,
Category: Business,
Words: 705 | Published: 01.22.20 | Views: 375 | Download now

Management, Experience, Scientific method

Get essay

Leadership, Problems, Theory

In respect to McCleskey (2014), stalwart leadership style is suitable in the current leadership surroundings as it authenticates both a task and a relationship target in a innovator (as mentioned in Timbre, 2014). This leadership style differs from all other models for the reason that it focuses on on main personal attributes and philosophy over any specific command techniques. The values and attributes of servant leadership are derived from the selfless, others-directed motivation that resides in the leader making it distinctive from other leadership versions (Smith, 2005). Even Russell (2001), declares that the value system kept by servant leadership happen to be unique and distinguish them from rest of the leadership theories (as offered in Cruz, 2005, g. 7). The conceptual studies by Patterson (2003), affirms that stalwart leaders and servant fans are seen as moral like for others, humility, altruism, dedication and trust to the leader.

Servant leadership theory has been when compared to Burn’s transformational leadership theory and was often belittled for being follower-centric where company objectives will be overlooked (Carroll, 2013). Farling, Stone, Winston (1999), also available similarities among transformational and servant command where the two model are focused on others: leader-followers process. The key distinction is the fact servant management concerns for the need to invest in followers, through encouragement, empowerment, and support and promotes followers to grow in know-how and autonomy and become servant leaders themselves (Northouse, 2013), transformational management seeks to motivate employees (followers) simply by focusing the importance of activity and objective to attain company objectives/goals previously mentioned their own (Bass Avolio, 1994).

Greenleaf (1977), and Spears (2010), both identified ten features effective servant leaders own: (1) listening- actively interact to followers’ will need and concerns by being attentive first, (2) empathy- allows and acknowledges the unique attempts of fans, (3) healing- supports and promote human wish to find wholeness in a person’s self while others, (4) awareness- identify complications and chances for self-growth, (5) persuasion- relying on trust and to impact rather than driving to follow them, (6) conceptualization- ability to end up pregnent solutions to issue, (7) foresight- ability to discover or predict the future and work to manage it, (8) stewardship- the concern for the wellbeing of individual fans as well as organization as a whole, (9) commitment to the growth of people- helping and empowering persons extrinsically reach intrinsic beliefs within these people, and (10) building community- to build a vibrant and resistant community.

Evolution of Servant leadership

After the identity of five servant leadership attributes, it provided platform which enhanced the philosophical understanding of what sort of servant leader might connect to followers (Spears, 1998). Over the decades many researchers came up with different numbers of features for servant leadership, for example Farling et al. (1999), identified five attributes below two wide-ranging components, Russell and Natural stone (2002), identified twenty stalwart leadership attributes, and Patterson (2003), discovered seven stalwart leadership characteristics through which leader-followers interact. A model designed by Patterson (2003), showed how they are interrelated group of constructs that influence the other person yet functions independently of 1 another to ultimately present itself in an observable and measurable set of behaviors of a servant leader.

Despite, the identification of attributes by simply Spears, there were limitations approach exchange these types of attributes in real world (Carroll, 2013). Possibly Russell Rock (2002), as well agrees within the limited evidence to support the concept of servant leadership valid intended for organizational leadership. However , servant leadership is practiced successfully in some with the American’s many successful businesses such as South west Airlines, TDI industries and Synovus which are listed in Fortune’s ‘Top Best Companies to Work in America’ of 2001 (Washington, Sutton Field, 2006). Until new servant leadership was well-known in european countries (Han, Kakabadse Toby, 2009), nevertheless is gaining interest in East countries as well. Servant management was explored in China and tiawan (Han, Kakabadse Andrew, 2009), India (Carroll, 2013) and Australia (Dillman, 2003). All of them found out that servant leadership is present in the leaders of these countries pertaining to long time, only they were not aware of the theory (Dillman, 2003).

Function of stalwart leaders.

A stalwart leader’s key purpose and motivation is to encourage success in others, whereas organizational success is the indirect, extracted outcome of servant-leadership (Smith, 2010).

< Prev post Next post >