film analysis elizabeth the gold age essay
Queen Elizabeth I was one of the most memorable, most discussed and many written about monarch not only in Britain, but in American history (Dobson and Watson 2; Rozett 103). Your woman was the only monarch that historians attributed an entire time of British history following. The film “Elizabeth: the Golden Age” is an example of the Queen’s popularity in literature.
Although much of the film had accurately depicted the life span of the California king as to the reason the Elizabethan period of Britain was associated to the amount of peace and prosperity, there have been a number of mistakes between the details shown inside the film against data recovered from historic records.
This kind of paper will be presenting these discrepancies and an insight on Queen Elizabeth I’s look at towards relationship and internal profile. The film “Elizabeth: the Gold Age” was set in the year 1565, the moment Spain was considered as the most powerful Disposition in American history and was under the secret of Ruler Philip II.
In order to achieve his goal to pass on the Catholic faith throughout Europe, Philip II began what this individual considered as a holy warfare. This warfare had allowed him to conquer all of the European countries, aside from England that has been still beneath the rule of your Protestant Princess or queen, Elizabeth I. Although not immediately stated, the film implied that it was in the year 1585 that Philip II decided it had been time to detox England from the clutches with the devil reigned over by a hottie (“Elizabeth: the Golden Age”). The film depicted Full Philip II clearly while someone who extremely despised California king Elizabeth My spouse and i in her entirety.
However , Campion and Holleran stated that when California king Elizabeth We ascended the throne in 1558, Full Philip 2 in fact proposed marriage for the Queen. Although she nicely declined is usually marriage pitch, she accepted the guidance and safeguard that Full Philip 2 offered to her (2). In the meantime, in a meeting with her political advisers, Princess or queen Elizabeth I used to be warned that her region was at this point divided by simply religion. Half of the country was now rehearsing the Catholic faith with all the other half rehearsing the Protestant faith.
They recommended for the Queen that measures has to be taken resistant to the English Catholics. This was mainly because her advisors saw the English fans of the Catholic faith like a threat to Elizabeth I’s reign because of two reasons. The 1st was that simply because they were exercising the Catholic, this meant that they had sibling themselves with the P�re and the kingdom of The country, who has recently been considered inside the film since England’s very best enemy. The other was that the Catholics will no longer recognized Elizabeth I because their ruler.
Somewhat, their dedication had moved to Mary Stuart, the Queen’s relative and to whom they considered to be the rightful Queen-in-waiting. Full Elizabeth I actually responded to her advisers that she would not really punish her people due to their religious values and certain them that she was told the people even now revered her as their Queen (“Elizabeth: the Golden Age”). The split in England, caused by religious philosophy, had been problems that would not occur during Queen At the I’s rule.
Instead, this kind of division was an issue the Queen passed down from her predecessors, Jane Tudor and her daddy, Henry VIII. According to historical documents, Henry VIII rejected the papal authority in 1534 and thought the title of Supreme Head of the National Church. With all the ascension of Mary Tudor to the tub in 1553, she wanted to reconcile the English Church with all the Church of Rome. In the beginning, Elizabeth I had been considered to be modest when it came to spiritual affairs seeing that she was more concerned in keeping her throne, retaining the peacefulness and the promotion of the success of England.
Furthermore, Elizabeth I himself accepted three different beliefs during her lifetime: Anglo-Catholic, Catholic, and Protestant. It was why the lady did not see the English Catholics as a menace and refrained herself via imposing serious punishments. She did, however , encouraged faith based uniformity simply by setting the. She acquired also pushed her subjects to give up their resistance from the established Church of England (Campion and Holleran 11-14; Cole 2; Taylor-Smither 63).
Sir Francis Walsingham revealed to Full Elizabeth We in the film that an assassination plot known as the “Enterprise of England” was discovered masterminded by the Spanish monarchy. The plot included two armies were situated over the coasts of Sussex and Norfolk. These people were waiting for the order to help Mary Stuart to assassinate Elizabeth My spouse and i and to set Mary Stuart on the tub of Britain. When the girl learned about the assassination strive, Queen At the I faced the ambassadors of Philip II to England.
This caused the ambassadors to get rid of their office in shame and to watch her as the center of your international Simple conspiracy inciting a rebellion both in the Netherlands and in France (Doran “Elizabeth I and Foreign Insurance plan, 1558-1603” 8; “Elizabeth: the Golden Age”). Upon the discovery with the assassination storyline, Mary Stuart had given the order to execute the assassination story on the California king. While your woman was in house of worship, one of the followers of the Enterprise of England managed to get throughout the guards at the front of the chapel and tried to kill the Queen by using a gun.
However , the pistol used was south florida, and the Queen survived the assassination look at. The meurtrier and the various other members with the Enterprise of England had been captured, imprisoned and tormented. Later, Friend Walsingham then confronted Jane Stuart based on the assassination make an effort on the California king and her involvement towards the plot. She was in that case presented the orders the girl had provided to the associates of the Enterprise of England to move forward with the killing of the Queen. Mary Stuart was tried out for treason and was executed by beheading. It had been only following your execution of Mary Stuart that Friend Walsingham understood the true goal of The country of spain.
Through the execution of Mary Stuart who had been both a Catholic and an ally of Spain, England provided Philip II a reason to wage war against Britain (“Elizabeth: the Golden Age”). Although this served since the orgasm of the entire film, in addition, it contained one of the most of the differences on historic documents and records aside from Mary Stuart’s involvement in the assassination attempt on the life of Full Elizabeth We. This would not come as a surprise since there have been many documents and literary performs where the incidents of the your life of Queen Elizabeth My spouse and i were re-arranged.
An example of this was the biography made by Sir Walter Scott entitled Kenilworth where he improved the events so that Amy Robsart, the initial wife of Robert Dudley which occurred in 1560 will coincide with the entertainment vision at Kenilworth which occurred in 1575 (Rozett 104). Jane Stuart, who was also known in history as Martha, Queen of Scots, started to be the Full of Scotland after her birth in 1542. The girl married the Dauphin of France and became the California king of Portugal when he ascended the throne in 1559. Her rule as Princess or queen of France was simply short-lived, as her husband died one year later his excursion to the throne.
She then returned to Scotland to assume her place since the Full of Scots upon the death of her mom. Her doing well marriages had been met with this sort of scandal. Of those marriages, the most scandalous was her relationship to the Earl of Bothwell, who had been viewed as the so-called murderer of her second husband. Her marriage for the Earl of Bothwell resulted to a nationwide uprising in which she was defeated in 1567. Your woman was in that case forced to indication a doc on the threat of loss of life to forgo her throne and title of the Princess or queen of Ireland.
She tried to regain her title by raising another army that was also defeated. She then simply sought protection on her existence in England and her cousin, Elizabeth I actually. Outraged by the actions made by the Scottish lords against her cousin, Elizabeth I actually protected her cousin and detained her as a hostage (Campion and Holleran 2-3; Perry 145-46). Since the loss of life of Mary Tudor and Elizabeth I’s ascension for the English tub, Mary Stuart had portrayed publicly her legitimate claims to the English language throne as her mom was the eldest sister of Henry VIII, Elizabeth I’s father.
Even though she was obviously a prisoner in the uk, she remained to be a danger to Elizabeth I. When reports had been brought to Queen Elizabeth I’s attention that her relation was linked to assassination and building plots against her, Parliament transferred for Mary Stuart’s execution. Initially, At the I did not look at this option as there was no evidence that proved the allegations against Mary Stuart. That all improved upon when ever Sir Francis Walsingham uncovered the killing plot against the Queen called the Babington plot.
To gather evidence regarding the involvement of Mary Stuart on the plan, he bought Mary Stuart to be moved to a house in which she could be more tightly monitored and appointed a fresh jailer who had been less sympathetic to Jane Stuart. Quickly, Mary Stuart began to receive news by Europe which were smuggled with her through water-resistant packages placed in the bungholes of beverage kegs. Unidentified to Martha Stuart, Friend Walsingham got already intercepted these emails and had was able to decode these people before Martha Stuart and her confidantes received all of them.
It was in this article that Sir Walsingham learned that the plotters of the assassination of the California king were went by a rich and idealistic Catholic squire named Anthony Babington and this there were sixty thousand The spanish language and English soldiers all set to rescue Martha upon receiving her acceptance. She accepted the assassination and her rescue in writing. Sir Walsingham presented to Elizabeth We the guidelines and endorsement written by Mary Stuart in her personal handwriting because evidence and proof of the allegations made against Mary Stuart.
Following protecting Martha Stuart intended for nineteen years, Elizabeth I was compelled by law to copy Mary to Fortheringhay Castle where the girl was attempted and was found accountable on the criminal offenses of treason. She was executed by beheading in 1587. The betrayal brought by Mary Stuart to attempt to assassinate her, Elizabeth I’s view towards Catholics began to transform and saw them while traitors and a danger to her lifestyle. This ended in her applying sterner laws and regulations against Catholics were forced with fines ranging from aigu? to imprisonment, torture and death (Campion and Holleran 11-14; Taylor-Smither 63; Jones 147-48).
Full Philip II launched his Spanish Flotte against Great britain a year after the execution of Mary Stuart. This decision was not motivated by the execution of Jane Stuart. Alternatively, it was a result of the weak relationship between the two countries. Between the a lot of 1565 and 1566, various members of the Spanish noble had demanded Philip 2 to postpone the Spanish Inquisition since they seen his procedures against Protestantism as an effort to extend The spanish language control over the ecclesiastical affairs as a drive to challenge traditional liberties of Italy.
This Inquisition was in the short term placed on carry due to the regular threats in the Turks to Spain. As soon as the Turks signed a series of treaties with Spain, that gave Full Philip II the opportunity to once again pursue his goal to expand The spanish language rule more than Europe (Doran “Elizabeth I actually and Foreign Policy, 1558-1603” 6-10). The partnership between The country and England had started to damage as a result of many events that had occurred between Full Philip II’s courtship to Queen At the I and the war between Spain and England.
Among these situations were the voyages of Francis Drake around the world which were secretly supported by Elizabeth We. On top of these products from the New World, Drake as well looted the Spanish galleons he found of which the Queen approved a portion of when he returned from his journeys in 1580 (Doran “Elizabeth I and Overseas Policy, 1558-1603” 9). The Spanish Flotte greatly outnumbered the British army for the reason that population of England was significantly less than that of Italy which triggered fewer capable men to get enlisted in the army.
Also, the armed forces technology in the English armed service was considerably behind than any other Europe and it had been impossible pertaining to Queen At the I to keep an army financially because throughout the four many years of her reign, most of the financial resources had been allotted towards the maintenance of the blend of politics, socializing and ceremonies the Queen accomplished through moves around the kingdom (Cole one particular; Doran “Elizabeth I and Foreign Coverage, 1558-1603” six; Frye 75; Thomas 160). As the Spanish Armada drew close to, Elizabeth I gathered her small army and urged them with a brief oration which can be now known as the “Oration in Tilbury Camp.
” This short presentation was considered by most writers and historians acknowledged as one of the best speeches composed with a monarch in England’s history. The most stunning line in the speech that has been mentioned inside the film, though reworded, was “I […] come to lay down to get my the almighty, and for my personal [kingdom], and for my people, [my] honor and my blood vessels in the dust […] I know I’ve the body […] of a weakened and [feeble] woman, [but] I have the [heart] and [stomach] of your [king], and a [king] of England also […]” (“Elizabeth: the Gold Age”; Frye 98; Green 424-26).
Maybe what made Princess or queen Elizabeth My spouse and i such an enigma for many historians and copy writers was her decision to stay unmarried, which is why she has recently been referred to in history as “the Virgin California king. ” Her decision to remain unmarried worked out down to her ladies-in-waiting and her courtiers such that, to make certain that they be committed, they must initial seek an approval of the California king. Those who married in magic formula would have to deal with the fury of the California king and might even have to face imprisonment.
Such was the case in the movie the moment she lashed out against Bess, her favorite lady-in-waiting and Walter Raleigh when she found out they had not only married with out her approval, but were expecting a child. Although there are no documentation learned regarding the face between California king Elizabeth We, Walter Raleigh and Bess, there are numerous accounts on the reactions of anger the Princess or queen exemplified upon the breakthrough of the key marriages from the members of her the courtroom. The most recorded was the episode between Full Elizabeth We and certainly one of her ladies-in-waiting named Mary Shelton.
When Elizabeth I discovered Mary Shelton’s marriage to James Scudamore, she increased and required why Mary Shelton or James Scudamore did not search for her endorsement before they will got married. A single eyewitness stated that Martha Shelton was hit profusely by the angered Queen and was bombarded by the Princess or queen with a candlestick which caused Mary Shelton’s finger to get broken (Doran “Monarchy and Matrimony” 5-6; “Elizabeth: the Golden Age”; Hammer 80-81). Historical data provided two reasons about why California king Elizabeth Choice to remain unmarried throughout her reign.
Is that it was her own decision in order to be able to concentrate most her focus on the affairs of the kingdom. This was evident in the speech that she had made by Parliament in 1559 if the members of Parliament presented her a petition to marry. The lady responded to this kind of petition simply by stating that she had been married to her husband, the Kingdom of England. This staying the case, she did not discover any reasons why she will need to still marry a man. One more historical records presented in connection to her choosing to remaining unmarried were her cousin, Jane Stuart and the circumstances around her cousin’s marriage.
As i have said earlier, Mary Stuart’s marital life to her third husband triggered a city uprising in Scotland. Following being conquered in the civil uprising, the Scottish lords forced Mary Stuart to abdicate the throne of Scotland and her name as California king of Ireland. Queen Elizabeth I saw her cousin’s relationship as the main cause of her cousin’s drop and feared that should the lady marry, similar events may possibly happen to her (Doran “Monarchy and Matrimony” 2; Full 30-33; Taylor-Smither 61).
Specialists have also provided studies to explain Queen At the I’s decision to remain single. Based on their particular findings, specialists concluded that Queen Elizabeth I used to be a broken human being, based on Sigmund Freud’s theory of personality. This kind of damage took place during her childhood when ever she seen not only her father, California king Henry VIII, accusing her mother, Bea Boylen, in the crime of adultery, yet also your woman witnessed her mother’s delivery by beheading after the girl was attempted and found doing the offense.
This child years memory afflicted Queen At the I’s individuality such that the lady began to include the characteristics of males. It also induced her to spot with men in terms of becoming dominant and exemplifying attributes of fearlessness and getting aggressive. Because of these personality traits that Queen At the I implemented and pictured, it would help to make it difficult for her to become wife and a mom because the nature that a wife and a mother during this time period included getting submissive to her husband and to the requirements of her children.
Specialists have also known her unmanageable and unexpected bursts of rage and mood swings. An example of this was observed in the film when the girl found out that her favourite lady-in-waiting, Bess, not only committed Walter Raleigh, but also is expecting a kid. This was likewise evident in historical documents when the girl attacked her lady-in-waiting named Mary Shelton and James Scumadore upon learning that they can married with no first seeking her endorsement for their union. These events led contemporary psychologists in conclusion that Princess or queen Elizabeth I was suffering from clinical hysteria.
This hysteria was brought about by the unconscious anxieties that the girl was encountering as a result of her witnessing her mother’s trial and performance as well as simply by feelings of jealousy. This jealously was exemplified inside the film when ever Queen Elizabeth I confided to Bess that your woman was desirous of Bess because although she was a Queen, there are many things that her lady-in-waiting may appreciate which she, as a Princess or queen, can never knowledge (Doran “Monarchy and Matrimony” 5-6; “Elizabeth: the Glowing Age”; Hammer 81).
Generally, the depiction of the existence of California king Elizabeth My spouse and i in the film “Elizabeth: the Golden Age” was satisfactory, if not really accurate. This showed the 2 sides of the Queen. Similarly, she was a fearless innovator devoted to her country and her obligations as Queen that she’d rather sacrifice personal delights such as becoming married in order to concentrate on her obligations with her kingdom. In addition, she proved that, in period where females are considered as inferior to men, a woman did not need a man by her aspect in order to regulation a country.
Her experiences during her childhood allowed her to develop crucial characteristics which a leader during this time period must have – dominance, ruthlessness, hostility and fearlessness. On the other hand, the film likewise depicted the Queen because an emotionally weak person. The same the child years experiences that helped her develop her admirable attributes also brought on her to become clinically hysterical based on the findings of modern-day specialists.
Her condition caused her to exemplify sudden mental outbursts of rage which affected the lives of those who served her courtroom with her outbursts at times causing harm to prospects who have continued to be loyal with her. However , the re-arrangement required for the film with regards around the timeline and reasons for occasions to occur might have provided confusing details for the viewers from the film since these situations have been re-arranged just as Sir Walter Scott had performed centuries just before in order to correlate the events provided in the film to each other even if historical data showed or else.
It can only be assumed the re-arrangement and changes on the relationship of the events that occurred through the timeline provided in the film may have been done in order to get the film to become even more exciting to see and to highlight more on the positive attributes of the California king which made her the most used monarch of Western record. Works Offered Campion, Edmund and Adam V. Holleran. A Jesuit Challenge: Edmund Campion’s Discussions at the Tower of Birmingham in 1581. New York: Fordham University Press, 1999. (4) Cole, Jane Hill.
The Portable California king: Elizabeth I and the National politics of Service. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999. (2) Dobson, Michael and Nicola J. Watson. England’s At the: an Afterlife in Popularity and Fantasy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University or college Press, the year 2003. (1) Doran, Susan. At the I and Foreign Insurance plan, 1558-1603. Nyc: Routledge, 2150. (4) Doran, Susan. Monarchy and Matrimony: the Courtships of At the I. New York: Taylor & Francis Routledge, 1996. (3) Elizabeth: the Golden Era. Dir. Shekar Kapur. Perf. Cate Blanchett, Geoffry Dash, Abbie
Cornish, and Samantha Morton. 2007. DVD. Widespread Studios, 2008. (7) Frye, Susan. “The Myth of Elizabeth at Tilbury. ” Sixteenth 100 years Journal. twenty three. 1 (1992): 95- 114. (2) Green, Janet Meters. “‘I Myself’: Queen Elizabeth I’s Oration at Tilbury Camp. ” Sixteenth Hundred years Journal. twenty-eight. 2 (1997): 421-45. (1) Hammer, Paul E. M. “Sex and the Virgin Princess or queen: Aristocratic Concupiscence and the Court docket of At the I. ” Sixteenth 100 years Journal. 31. 1 (2000): 77-97. (2) King, Steve N. “Queen Elizabeth My spouse and i: Representations of the Virgin California king.
” Renaissance Quarterly. 43. 1 (1990): 30-74. (1) Perry, Nancy. The Word of any Prince: A lifetime of Elizabeth I actually from Modern Documents. Rochester, NY: Boydell and Brewer Ltd., 1990. (1) Rozett, Martha Stick. Constructing a global: Shakespeare Britain and the New Historical Hype. Albany, NEW YORK: University of recent York Press, 2003. (2) Taylor-Smither, Larissa J. “Elizabeth I: A Psychological Account. ” Sixteenth Century Record. 15. you (1984): 47-72. (3) Thomas, Jane Run. Behind the Mask: the Life of Queen Elizabeth I. New York: Houghton- Mifflin Transact and Research, 1998. (2)
You may also want to consider the following: sis golden curly hair surprise
1
