game theory analysis in real life term paper
Words: 734 | Published: 01.21.20 | Views: 620 | Download now
Excerpt from Term Paper:
Why did Apartheid End?
A Solution Developed from the Idea of Game Theory
James Michener was a background professor with the University of Texas and a widely read chronicler of different times of history. Michener was generally a novelist, but his novels were deduced on factual information that was peopled by imaginary, but representative, main character types and some historical figures. In a book named “The Agreement, ” Michener detailed the history of the land of S. africa from prehistoric times up to the later 1970’s. In the book, the writer spent a great deal of time talking about how the practice of racediskrimination came about, and why it continued for more than 300 years (culminating inside the institutionalization with the practice in 1948 (Lodberg)).
This newspaper examines how come the Southern region African government chose to end the practice of apartheid according to the rules expressed in game theory.
At the beginning of the training course (Lecture two: Normal Contact form Games) the concept of game theory was defined, and guidelines were collection by which a situation could be reviewed using the theory. The initial parameter is that there is a group of players who have are the decision makers, and in addition they can be countable or uncountable. The second portion of the definition is usually that the game is played using a set of tactics which are the decisions and actions of the players. Finally, there has to be some payoff for the players to play the game.
The chosen game appears complex, nevertheless for this brief paper will probably be highly simple. The players can be in 3 primary groupings: The white colored ruling authorities that been with us in South Africa; the combined ethnicity number of natives, coloreds and Asians; and, the international community. The different strategies used by “” were to enact a system where the 4 different teams that been around in the country were segregated into their own communities that existed by separate rules, the non-white ethnicities that protested and disrupted the “harmony” of the light ruler’s decision, and the exterior protests and sanctions made by the intercontinental community. The payoff to get the lording it over class was that they preserved racial and religious chastity, and that they exclusively ruled the. The blended ethnic group protested and disrupted the decisions created by the whites because they desired equality and freedom. The international community recognized your rights violations occurring in the area and desired to further the interests from the mixed-ethnicity inhabitants of the location. For the purposes on this paper, the choice tree will abide by the basic decision for the whites of whether to continue or cease apartheid, the non-whites in the country to protest which could result in jail time or flexibility if the decision they have produced is successful, as well as the international community’s options of pressure through calamité or departing the country exclusively and allowing for the status quo to stay.
It would seem, through the information merely given, the fact that objectives of every of the players was known and that everybody at the panel (so to speak) a new clear watch of what the other participant offered. However , this is not basically true. The whites assumed, although there were throughout the world protests plus they had been banned from many international wearing competitions (The Economist) that they can had the very best interests from the country at heart. They believed that the light rulers had been caretakers of the other races, and they had a God-given imperative to behave as they would (Lodberg). The rulers were of the judgment that they realized what was best for their region and overlooked the worldwide pressure. The ethnic groupings living in S. africa made the assumption the whites enjoyed cruelty, and they acted because they did because of the electric power they practiced through a highly effective army and police force. Since international protection was not allowed for these people, we were holding not able to see the work that was being performed