how peace can be attained after conflict
Peace is generally considered to always be a direct result of warfare. Nevertheless , this will not always be the situation. By evaluating two case studies, specifically the Bangladesh Liberation Battle and the Local Gulf Warfare, through the analysis of options, it can be noticed that occasionally, war does not end with tranquility.
Let us glance at the Bangladesh Liberation War. To conclude this event just, it was, because the brand suggests, a fight between for the liberty of Bangladesh from Pakistan, which was regarded at the time since East and West Pakistan respectively, which will began in March 1971 and ended with the give up of Pakistan in 12 , 1971. Considering that the subject on this war was Bangladesh, in order to evaluate if peace was achieved after the Bangladesh Freedom War, we should analyze options that treat the state in Bangladesh in the months and years following war.
The 1st source that is analyzed can be an article from your website with the Encyclopedia Britannica entitled “Bangladesh since Independence”. It reveals a third person perspective for the major situations in Bangladesh from 72 till 2010. It declares that inch[in] January 1972″, a month after the surrender of Pakistan, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was “installed as the first prime minister from the new parliamentary government of Bangladesh”. However , on fifteenth August 1975, he “was assassinated along with most of his friends and family. ” The original source states that “right-wing pro-Pakistan army officers were in back of the killing” and “some politicians had been involved in the conspiracy”. The source as well states that there were “paramilitary forces, known as Razakars, which in turn supported the Pakistani cause”. These troops killed a large number of Urdu speakers, who were the minority. Hence, from this source, it can be found that in the aftermath of the Bangladesh Liberation War, chaos and bloodshed was prominent, not peace.
The Encyclopedia Britannica is a fact-checked general knowledge encyclopedia, and its content articles are authored by a crew of publishers and authorities, and all edits made to the online site, from which I came across this article, are reviewed and checked multiple times before they are approved by the Encyclopedia Britannica professional staff. This source was also written following your conflicts had been over with a third party for the sole reason for education, and so based of it context, it will a trustable source. Hence, this article is trustworthy.
The other source can be an article posted on a website about Bangladesh Creation Studies on the 5th of September, 2011. It also presents a third-person perspective and discusses that state Bangladesh was in following your war, coming from 1972 to 1975. This source as well states that after gaining sovereignty, Bangladesh was ruled simply by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. In addition , it brings up additional information that “higher regulators depended on the anti-liberation top notch class”, and so “they purposely misguided [Mujibur wonderful government] and made them unpopular inside very short” time. This source as well reinforces the fact that “[in] August 1975, Mujibur, and most of his family members, had been assassinated by¦ pro-Pakistani army officers”. Consequently, from this source, it can also be seen that peacefulness was not obtained in Bangladesh in the years following the Liberation War.
However , this article, unlike the previous source, was not written by a team of experts. It had been written by a person by the name of Shuza Uddin, whom I cannot get much regarding apart from the fact that he managed to graduate from the Dhaka University of International Associations in Bangladesh. He also seemed to have only mentioned Wikipedia because his supply. Hence, the reliability of the article authored by him is questionable. Furthermore, as Shuza Uddin is definitely from Bangladesh, he might have got exaggerated the info on the supply. Thus, this source is not completely reliable.
Next, i want to study the Gulf Battle, or since it is sometimes referred to as, the Persian Gulf Battle. On August 1990, War, under the guideline of Saddam Hussein, invaded neighboring nation Kuwait. About 29 Nov 1990, the U. In. Security Authorities authorized the use of military pressure against Korea if it would not withdraw coming from Kuwait by January 15. When Saddam Hussein would not comply, U. N. causes, known as Operation Desert Thunderstorm, went in and war broke out. The war lasted right up until 28 Feb . that year, when US President George H. W. Bush announced a ceasefire. Since the subject matter of this warfare was the Gulf region, to be able to evaluate if peace was achieved following the Gulf Battle, we must examine sources that address the state of hawaii in the region in the months and years following a war, specially in Iraq.
The initially source that is to be analyzed is usually an article eligible “Persian Gulf of mexico War” around the History Channel website. This discusses regarding the issues before, during and after the warfare, but just be the situation following the war will probably be studied. The origin states that “in instant aftermath with the war, Hussein’s forces completely suppressed uprisings by Kurds in the north of War and Shi’ites in the southern. ” It also states that Iraqi pushes also regularly “exchanged fireplace with U. S. and British aircraft” “patrolling and mandating a no-fly zone” over Korea. In addition , the origin brings up the truth that the “US issued a great ultimatum upon 17 March 2003 demanding that Saddam Hussein step down via power and leave Iraq within 48 hours” with no prior consultation with the U. N, which will Hussein rejected. This generated the Iraq War beginning three days and nights later. Hence, as there was clearly an evident presence of conflict in Iraq inside the aftermath in the Gulf War, it can be noticed that tranquility was not accomplished.
Content articles on the History Channel website, just like the episodes broadcasted worldwide on the funnel itself, will be written and checked with a team of experts and professional historians, and the Background Channel recently been recognized by the public globally to become one of the most dependable sources of traditional information in the media. Furthermore, the information in the source was written long after the battle was over and for the sole purpose of education, although the Background Channel is definitely an American tv network and America was one of the key players in the Gulf Warfare and its post occurences. Hence, this is a reliable origin.
The second source that will be studied is a front site of an concern of Bangor Daily Media, an American magazine. It was published on Thursday, 20 Drive 2003, the afternoon the Iraq War began. The headline reads “It’s War” as well as the subheading reads “US releases surgical affect on Iraq”. This demonstrates war features broken out. One of the head lines of the content articles in the issue also states “US seeks to put out of action Saddam’s protectors”. It can be noticed from these lines that in the fallout of the Gulf of mexico War as well as the detestation the usa had to get Saddam Hussein leadership, the usa of America had declared war on Korea. The heading of the cover story also reads “Bush: ‘No final result but victory'”, displaying the sheer amount of bitterness the US experienced for Saddam while, concurrently, foreshadowing how much bloodshed this war will cause. Hence, since the Gulf Battle led to one other war, it truly is evident that peace had not been achieved.
All in all, it might appear through the Bangladesh Freedom War and the Gulf Battle that peace cannot be accomplished from war. However , in my opinion, it is not conceivable to pull a definitive argument, while whether or not serenity can be achieved after battle depends intensely on the context behind the war and the parties engaged. For instance, in case the war is a civil war and it is a fight entirely over the possession or control of a certain entity, once the control of that entity is claimed by among the parties, most conflicts will be resolved and the war should end right now there in serenity. On the other hand, if perhaps there are exterior ulterior motives behind the parties going into war, the chances of there being serenity after the war ends is incredibly unlikely, while there will be tension between your parties, that could drive these to continue going at each other’s neck. Furthermore, war and peace take opposite ends of the spectrum, so the process from battle to serenity is hardly ever immediate and takes time, which opens up area for more bloodshed to take place. Therefore , a certain resolution towards the guiding issue above is definitely unattainable.
