how to quit the courtroom system by imprisoning
Excerpt from Dissertation:
Innocent individuals are mistakenly convicted pertaining to the following almost eight reasons. First, eyewitness accounts can be inaccurate: this happens when an individual is definitely convinced that she or he saw the defendant partake in criminal activity – yet they are mistaken in their identity for whatever reason (they may be exaggerating their role as a “witness” for vainglorious factors, for instance).
Second, account can be perjured: this means that a witness basically lies around the stand in so that it will cause harm to the defendant. Third, the availability or unavailability of DNA screening can cause faithful persons to get convicted as a result of “crucial” facts that is used or misused which would in any other case exonerate these people. Fourth, DNA testing is definitely inaccurate: this happens when, in case that GENETICS evidence is employed, it is actually not yet proven or corrupted in the process of obtainment, so that it can actually have opposite planned effect – rather than scientifically “prove” the identity associated with an individual engaged, it can be made to look like another individual (the defendant is involved); this is just like perjury: the “evidence” is comprised.
Fifth, prosecutors can wrong doings themselves: therefore they take opprobrious steps to gain a conviction out of sheer self-love (their careers will reap the benefits of high confidence rates). Sixth, the public prosecutor is ineffective: this means that the attorney employed to represent the defendant would not provide a appropriate or sufficient defense against the prosecution. Seventh, there are not enough funds intended for adequate prosecuting attorney: this can bring about poor defense counsel because better attorneys can not be afforded. Finally, eighth, law enforcement officials can misconduct themselves by simply eliciting fake confessions or perhaps by adulterating the pretrial criminal procedure processes: because of this police simply want to close a case by arresting someone in spite of guilt and may fabricate data in order to secure a confidence and see the situation closed (Krieger, 2011).
2 . Provide a single (1) sort of each of the main reasons why innocent individuals are wrongly found guilty.
James Lee Woodward was convicted of rape and murder due to inaccurate eyewitness testimony: a single witness later recanted and “the different was named into question” leading to Woodward’s exoneration (Krieger, 2011, l. 343).
Kin-Jin Wong was convicted of murder based on the perjured testimony of any corrections official and a great inmate. The inmate got never seen Wong just before but prior to the trial was approached by officer who have suggested to him which the attacker was “Oriental, inch and the defendent saw an opportunity to “better” his own circumstance by supporting the expert spin a yarn. The inmate after recanted (Krieger, 2011, l. 344).
Bruce Godschalk was convicted of rape in 1986, but DNA evidence after helped to exonerate him as the results of the DNA test proven that Godschalk was not the rapist (Krieger, 2011).
Cameron j. Todd Willingham was found guilty of deliberately setting a fireplace that slain his children in their house but the scientific evidence accustomed to gain the conviction was not convincing to experts whose later testimony indicated that the fire marshal who spoken was incompetent when it came to deciding whether arson or incident was the cause of a fire (Krieger, 2011).
In the case of Dretke v. Haley, Haley was sentenced to fifteen years for any
