humanistic psychology critique of mainstream term

Category: Scientific research,
Words: 738 | Published: 02.10.20 | Views: 569 | Download now

Humanistic Psychology

Mainstreaming, Romanticism, Abnormal Mindset, Animal Remedy

Excerpt from Term Newspaper:

24). Leitner Phillips (2003, s. 160) also stress the need for a holistic associated with the human brain so that a much more effective summary can be made. Bugental (1963, p. 565) also decries the tendency to compartmentalize the field of psychology to make it appear like the organic sciences. In addition, this is an excellent cause for dilemma among psychology students mainly because they end up having a fragmented view with the field and they are ill-equipped to exchange ideas and insights with those specializing in the additional sub-fields of psychology instead of developing a healthy view of human nature.

Narrow vision as well as the tendency to watch psychological circumstances as illnesses by practitioners have direct consequences for the customers. Leitner Phillips (2003) explained that, “the stigmatization of psychiatric brands may occasionally exacerbate sociable problems and increase social isolation for those who likely have got increased demands for sociable supports” (p. 158). Because of this, the clients learn to turn into passive mainly because current methods encourage them to view their experiences as disorders that they simply cannot treat independently (Leitner Phillips, 2003).

A great Impersonal Way of the Relationship between Therapist and Client

In respect to Bugental (1963), “the three-headed huge of the medical team is not able, by the very nature, to meet the individual in real interpersonal encounter” (p. 566). This means that mainstream psychology, with the use of clinical groups and analytical diagnosis, bread of dogs an gregario relationship between your therapist and the client (Bugental, 1963). Is a tendency to view a psychological issue as a medical issue limitations the knowledge of the issue to its physiological and nerve aspects with out addressing your needs from the client.

Leitner Phillips (2003) also support the above perspective by saying that, “the use of traditional diagnoses requires the therapist to enforce labels for the client and might invalidate the client’s personal meanings” (p. 159). Which means that even before getting into the client-therapist relationship, your customer is ready to accept that he or she acts abnormally and requires treatment to correct the abnormal habits. As a result, your customer is forced to stifle or describe away the first experience to conform to the requirements of the relationship. Even after the relationship can be terminated, the client may continue to harbor thoughts of inadequateness because of the opinion that his mind has become abnormal and depends on the qualified (Leitner Phillips, 2003).

The dynamics of such an gregario relationship likewise prevent the consumer from dealing with religious and spiritual issues that are an essential part of the individual experience. Lukoff, Lu, Turner (1998) illustrate spiritual activities as opening the door to a higher amount of awareness. Hence, it is, important for counselors to enable their particular clients to achieve this higher level of awareness wherever they may understand their own activities and obtain inferences.


The presumptions held by simply mainstream mindset have not confirmed to be effective in addressing the holistic characteristics of individual experience. Humanistic and transcendental perspectives of psychology give an opportunity to integrate ideas regarding man like a unit rather than a conglomeration of specific parts and to treat his experiences while valid demanding interpretation. The central part of the specialist is replaced with that of a collaborative sociable relationship between client and therapist. The experiences of the consumer, rather than formal theories and paradigms, should be used to identify the potential for growth and development.


Bugental, J. N. T. (1963). Humanistic psychology: A new cutting-edge. American Psychiatrist, Vol. 18, pp. 563-567. Accessed coming from PsycInfo Database.

DeCarvalho, L. (1990). A history of the third force in psychology. Journal of Humanistic

Psychology, Volume. 30 (4), pp. 22-44. Accessed coming from Sage Journals Online.

Leitner, L. Meters., Phillips, S i9000. N. (2003). The steadfast object vs . The impressive force: Concerns and opportunities for humanistic psychology. Diary of Humanistic Psychology, Volume. 43, pp. 156-173. Utilized from Sage Journals On the net.

Lukoff, G., Lu, Farreneheit., Turner, 3rd there’s r. (1998). Coming from spiritual urgent to spiritual problem: The transpersonal beginnings of the fresh DSM-IV category. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 38, pp.

< Prev post Next post >