Impact of Government Policies Essay

Essay Topics: Essay, Family members, Impact, Policies,
Category: Government,
Words: 1548 | Published: 01.28.20 | Views: 282 | Download now

Using material by Item 2B and somewhere else, assess sociological views from the impact of presidency policies and laws on family existence (24 marks) Social guidelines are laws made by the state to bring an alteration to society. As stated in item 2B different politics policies will vary ideologies and agendas that they can try and strengthen through the friends and family. One example of a social plan is The Friends and family Act Rules in mil novecentos e noventa e seis which is a element of John Dominant Back to Basics Campaign’ and this released a one yr waiting period before a few could file for divorce.

Get essay

It was implemented to encourage and reinforce the nuclear as well as give lovers a chance to work on their interactions and not pick the easy way to avoid it. This insurance plan was to prefer New Correct as they believe divorce undermines the traditional nuclear family. In their view, divorce creates even more welfare based mostly lone parent or guardian families, 90% of all single parent families are matriarchal families and prevents kids from developing up correctly, without the guy role unit they need to achieve success for the future.

Mentioned previously in 2B the New Correct argue that the power system undermines traditional elemental family simply by encouraging lone parents through divorce. Postmodernists would entirely disagree with New Right thinkers and argue that this kind of policy produces less family diversity and stops the creation of new family types such as lone parent households and reconstituted families. As stated in Item 2B, feminists argue that cultural policies imagine the ideal family members s the nuclear family members, and this insurance plan favours this type of family.

Feminists would argue that most divorce cases are made simply by women, eight out of ten of most divorces. And thus feminists will think that by keeping women within a relationship for any year, this would be oppressing these to stay in an unsatisfied and maybe damaging relationship. This kind of policy could reinforce the ideology that Ansley says women will be the takers of shit’. Marxists will disprove this policy since it serves the needs of capitalism, retaining the indivisible family.

It is also very expensive therefore it doesn’t supply the chance for some of the working class to file for divorce which leads to more vacant shell relationships and maintains the two in an unhappy romantic relationship. This coverage has the effects of motivating the elemental family by giving the couple time to resolve their conflicts in hope of them agreeing to be together. On the other hand Lister (1996) suggests these policies will be an orgy of lone father or mother bashing’, by simply removing the possibilities of a lone parent family, which is disliked by conservatives and New Right.

One other policy launched by Harold Wilson in 1967 was the Abortion Act. This allowed abortion to become performed around the approval of two doctors, unless end of contract is immediately necessary to conserve a existence. This insurance plan was applied by Work and made contraception widely available, supplied with women more choice when it comes to their virility, and permits them to follow a career previous to children.

This policy was to control how big the population, and reducing the size of the family members encouraging child centered households and enabling parents to work with their methods and more focus on these types of few children. New Proper would disagree with this policy because they believe it’s reinforcing this ideology that ladies don’t have to start a friends and family, it attempts the traditional indivisible family. Functionalists would likewise disagree since reproduction is actually a function with the family, it is not meant to be altered with and it attempts the traditional nuclear family for society to work correctly.

On the other hand postmodernists would agree with this kind of policy since it favours variety and different family types just like cohabiting lovers and single person households. Feminists would also go along with this policy as it gives girls a chance to determine what they want related to their body and gives these people a to be able to focus on their very own career, previous to children by simply choice. Marxists would consent as the nuclear relatives serves the needs of capitalism and with the use of illigal baby killing, there will be significantly less families.

This kind of policy contrasts with the government policy in Romania in the 1980s in which the former communism government attemptedto increase the birth rate simply by putting restrictions on contraceptive and illigal baby killing, setting up virility centres, producing divorce harder to obtain and forcing childless couples to pay another 5% tax. This was set up to increase the citizenry and therefore improve the size people in Romania. In China and tiawan, there was a one child coverage to reduce population size and discouraged lovers from having more than one child.

In accordance to Adrian Wilson (1985) the coverage is supervised by workplace family planning committees, girls must search for permission to try and become to try to become pregnant, and there is a waiting around list and a quota for each manufacturing plant. Couples who also comply with the policy obtain extra benefits just like free medical and higher tax allowances, An just child will also get goal in education and enclosure in afterwards life. Couples who break the arrangement must repay their allowances and pay an excellent. Women are also faced the pressure to endure sterilization after their initial child. This kind of encourages visitors to have one kid and therefore affects family your life by handling family size through this policy.

An additional social plan is Working Family Duty Credit introduced by work government and improves the conditions of the underclass. It is a state benefit built to families that work and have low income. It absolutely was implemented to get a system of support to help people tackle child poverty and make operate pay. The policy covers up the salary of parents moving from rewards to low paid work.

It was a method of support for households by lowering the amount of tax they have to spend. It eliminates children away of low income and permits more chance within the family for children, such as education because with more wealth the child will not experience material deprivation and may gain more cultural capital, consequently bettering their educational prospects and more opportunities later in life. New Proper would believe this plan as it motivates people to have the traditional indivisible families by simply benefiting from this, functionalists favour this while the indivisible family will serve the features for contemporary society to run effectively.

Feminists would dislike this policy as it’s motivating women to stay in the traditional elemental family because they can benefit from that, this triggers women to stay in an unhappy relationship where they could be vulnerable to domestic violence. Marxists would as well dislike this kind of policy because the is serving the needs of capitalism, even more allowing the bourgeoisie to exploit its personnel through the family. A final example of a interpersonal policy is certain Start which has been implemented by Labour Authorities and aimed at giving every child the very best start at existence which offers a broad range of providers including friends and family health, our childhood care and education and improved health programmes to children outdated 4 and under.

It had been set up to finish child lower income, reduce sociable exclusion and save money by simply creating very well behaved kids who would be less likely to get involved in criminal offenses. It also delivers benefits to health, education and family life and encourages parents to get better parents, gives solitary parents chances. A study published in 12 , 2010, in comparison 5 12 months olds in sure start off areas with their contemporaries in non sure start areas and found that there were fewer obese children in the locations where the system had run. Parents believed there were many benefits, they said kids were very well behaved and healthier.

Fresh Right despise this social policy as it encourages more single mother or father families, learning they will receive help via sure begin and undermines the traditional indivisible family. Functionalists would agree with New Correct as it promotes more solitary parent families, undermines the standard nuclear as well as therefore the functions cant end up being performed throughout the family. Feminists would prefer this policy as it let us women get away the oppression from the family members, knowing lone parent families will get help from Sure Start.

There are 12 . 5 hours of free nursery readily available for children which can motivate people to use less time using their children therefore New Proper and Functionalists would disagree as mom and dad are supposed to interact socially their children. Marxists would also disagree since it creates more flexible hours for parents to function, therefore portion the requires of capitalism. In conclusion, the impacts of presidency policies and laws may have large effects about family existence and variations in family types.

< Prev post Next post >