joe s case study and evidence based practice essay
Research from Article:
Working with Clients with Dual Prognosis: The Case of Joe, (n. d. ) shows just how social procedures can have an effect on the lives of individuals, impacting their entry to and understanding of care alternatives and the availability of specific providers. Moreover, interpersonal policies can influence mental health practitioners, reinforcing stereotypes and stigmas toward patients with substance abuse disorders in particular. A systematic review of the literature discloses negative perceptions of medical researchers towards individuals with material use disorders are common and contribute to suboptimal health care for the patients, (Boekel, Brouwers, vehicle Weeghel Garresten, 2013, s. 23). Cultural workers have reached the front of drug abuse treatment, while social job professionals frequently encounter persons, families, and communities impacted by substance make use of disorders, including co-occurring disorders as in Joes case (NASW, 2013, l. 5). Therefore , in addition to their role in reducing judgment and making sure evidence-based practice in mental health care, interpersonal workers have to consider their role as catalysts for social policy reform.
Joes case demonstrates the importance of 3 core elements of social job: competency, evidence-based practice, and client confidentiality. All three of those issues happen to be covered by the NASW (2013) in its certain approach to mental health and element use disorders. Competency refers to a working control of recent health care coverage as well as best practices. Therefore , competency is related to the concept of evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice ensures that social personnel rely on study to guide guidelines, and that professional expertise is usually directly maintained scientific exploration. In fact , evidence-based practice can be requisite to ensure that clients like Joe to qualify for other payers (NASW, 2013). Customer confidentiality is definitely an ethical priority for a lot of case personnel. Preserving consumer confidentiality is known as a sign of respect pertaining to the client and helps engender the sort of trust that may be conducive to healing. Essentially, the cultural worker in Joes case recognizes the inherent harm that the battle with drugs produces, and counsel on behalf of May well. Social function aims to lessen harm, meaning refusing to place moral decision on persons like Later on and to especially refrain from criminalizing the client or diverting consumers into the criminal justice program.
However , social workers also understand how plans constrain their particular ability to make a change to help people just like Joe. Joes case shows gaps in service delivery relevant to intersectionality and social class status. Leading principles
