john integrity a specialist is study paper
Excerpt via Research Conventional paper:
That may be one of the ‘reliefs’ of having an honest code – a counselor does not need to engage in soul-searching as to whether her or his personal morals about John’s actions will be impinging after his or her judgment. The counselor can refer to the law and to the code of integrity for the profession, and know that telling upon John is correct, provided that someone’s life is at stake. A counselor need to strive to end up being objective, and in this case regress to something easier his or her actions based upon the law, and standardised codes of counseling integrity. A counselor who counsels ethically doubtful individuals, for example a counselor in prison or perhaps for a close acquaintances of inmates, must still be mindful of ethics as well as the law when ever negotiating these kinds of ethical minefields.
In this instance, a deontological, or perhaps categorical, honest system is needed – a counselor are unable to rationalize that situation is much better or more serious, relative to identical situations. “Rule deontological values… may be recognized as the seeking of ‘duty to complete right’why a conclusion was made and if it is based upon a basic principle good for every. rules to guide and guard individuals and groups and also to prescribe appealing decisions and proscribe undesired ones Express laws and policies, even though a deviation on the regulation ethics thought, often recommend what is backed by others, ” in addition to this case professional ethics and state legislation coincide (Bradley et ing. 2010: 219-220). John needs to be informed in the counselor’s honest obligations; nevertheless , before the counselor takes the necessary actions, presented the legal repercussions he may face because of the counselor’s actions.
Another question occurs as to what the counselor must inform the individual before the restorative process happens. John may possibly protest that he would not need revealed his HIV status, if he knew it can be used against him in a court of law. The counselor should think about giving individuals a full description about when he or the girl with legally obligated to reveal information that transpires during a counseling session.
An alternative solution, utilitarian look at of the situation might suggest that if people feel that their HIV position will be used against them, and used to endanger their confidentiality, they will both 1 . Stay away from tested in the first place 2 . Receive tested and not be honest with their consultants 3. Refuse to reveal their particular status to their partners, as a result of disclosure anxieties. However , the counselor can simply give credited consideration to the specific example, and become if establishing precedent intended for situations where the patient’s HIV status is well know and revealed. He or she are not able to excuse sketchy ethical activities and deviations from the code, based upon hypothetical scenarios in the foreseeable future, according to deontological ethics.
Barnett, Jeffrey Ofer Zur. (2010). Ethics rules on privacy. Psychotherapy and Counseling. Zu der Institute. Retrieved November a couple of, 2010 in http://www.zurinstitute.com/ethicsofconfidentiality.html
Bradley, Loretta J, Peggy L. Whiting, Bret Hendricks, Laura S. Wheat or grain. (2010). Moral imperatives to get intervention. The Family Record, 18(2) 215-221.
Retrieved November 2, 2010 at DOI: 10. 117711066480710364507
Indianapolis Superstar Examines HIV Confidentiality, Disclosure Laws. (2003, July 18). The Body.