of mice and men sweets character examination essay

Category: Domestic pets,
Words: 602 | Published: 02.11.20 | Views: 494 | Download now


Steinbeck presents Candies as a prone character. He does this simply by referencing him as a great “old man” before citing his name, employing pre-modification; in order that the reader quickly knows not only his physical state but maybe that metaphorically he is a weak person. He is as well shown to be eager throughout the starting of phase 2, in which he tries to make friends with George and Lennie as soon as he meets all of them. He gossips about other folks on the hacienda and makes sure George “won’t tell Curley nothing”.

This quote alone signifies Candy is definitely lonely and wants to have got friends but deep straight down is afraid of the different men on the ranch, suggesting he does not have many good friends on the farm at all, for that reason he has to be welcoming and assured towards George and Lennie to gain their particular friendship nevertheless this quotation gives away his fear of Curley finding out he was talking about him and tossing him off of the ranch, leading the reader to trust the hacienda is the simply place Candies can call home.

This thought of Candy staying completely by itself and having no where else to visit is reinforced when Steinbeck introduces Candy’s “ancient dog”, the use of pre-modification again on this occasion with the phrase “ancient” helps you to show that like his owner this dog can be old, the lexis “ancient” has the connotations of being and so old it could be considered a great artifact or perhaps piece of background, this concept can suggest that Candy’s dog is actually a part of the history of the ranch that is why he is still there because despite the fact that his doggie is old and pointless he is continue to allowed around the ranch even with no purpose, just like Chocolate staying for the ranch with no hand, that means he are not able to do any proper jobs other than “settin’ out your wash basins”.

However when Steinbeck introduces your canine at first, Chocolate says “my dog”, this possessive lexis could recommend Candy takes pride his dog especially as he goes on to say “he was a good sheepdog when he was younger”, you could take this estimate as a declarative, him guarding but as well bragging regarding his puppy. A conflicting idea could possibly be that Candies and dog are similar for this reason Candy likes to talk and brag about his doggie, Steinbeck publishes articles for the two that they are “old” and “ancient” but the two are disabled in that Candy offers lost his hand and the dog is so old and decrepit it cannot look or feed itself. The two are looking for a associate that could manage them, they have a codependent romantic relationship.

This idea could be regarded a repeating theme as some say Lennie and Georges’ relationship is usually co-dependent, though George more than likely admit it as a result of his handling personality. So the reason Candies brags about his puppy is because he really wants to confirm himself, and was in simple fact worthy of getting on the ranch. This point of Candy and his dog becoming similar facilitates my initial idea, which was that making use of the descriptions of Candy and his dog we discover that Chocolate is in fact much like an old pet, a useful and valued person in any hacienda as opposed to just something that occupies space, cash and foodstuff.


< Prev post Next post >