person centered therapies case study this situatio

Category: Personal issues,
Words: 1058 | Published: 03.17.20 | Views: 265 | Download now

Person Centered

Get essay

Person Centered Remedy, Rogerian, Rogerian Argument, Cheating

Excerpt by Case Study:

Those talks eventually allowed the client to appreciate that, on her behalf part, she’d not necessarily have worried greatly about marriage status got the same scenario occurred after she experienced lost her parents, or perhaps in the substitute, if her parents had never indicated such severe concern about this.

During that conversation, the therapist was careful to control the client away from the conclusion that she brought on Carlos to start taking medications and to manage the problem inside the relationship by withdrawing entirely. On the other hand, the therapist assisted the client to comprehend that matrimony “by ultimatum” is never favorable to happiness and that continuous arguments in that regard typically result in the breakup of a romantic relationship or inside the progression of the relationship to marriage although at least one partner does not really desire to be wedded or to always be married but. The outcome of this series of discussion posts was that the consumer came to understand that: (1) it truly is inappropriate for the patients parents to control the lives or decisions of adult children by suggesting or simply by actually threatening to take away their psychological support and love; (2) the stress the client skilled as a result of parental anticipations about out-of-wedlock children triggered her to exert a lot pressure on her partner that he decided to escape; and (3) the simple fact that her partner decided to escape in the manner that this individual did has not been the customer’s responsibility.

The other primary area of target was the incongruence between the person’s intellectual wish to forgive her current sweetheart for his infidelity with her mental response. More specifically, the therapist employed precisely the same techniques since employed in the prior issue and steered the discussions in a direction that enable the client to: (1) recognize that your woman was still far more angry with Lenny that may allow their self to acknowledge; (2) that her capacity that truth (incongruence) was obviously a direct function of her fear of losing him; (3) that component to her attachment to Lenny also pertained to her fears about her parents’ reaction to her to become single mom and the need to find a hubby who would accept another man’s child since his individual; determine regardless of whether, in reality, Lenny exhibited the qualities (such as the capacity to be dependable to be faithful in the future) and the various other qualities the fact that client required and had the right to expect in her wife; and (4) that facing the reality in the situation might require your customer to evaluate Lenny objectively devoid of fear of the results of giving him if perhaps leaving him was the ideal decision pertaining to the client and her child in the long run.

Toward that end, the specialist shared many personal stories about staying attached to someone for the wrong reasons, capacity acknowledging the fact and to responding genuinely to situations because of the fear of potential consequences, and (especially) the rightness from the decision to terminate certain relationships via a retrospective life view.

Conclusions

Your customer originally offered the inability to recognize that her profound anxiety about parental disapproval had influenced reactions to her pregnancy on her behalf part that substantially contributed to the degeneration of her relationship with her infant’s father. Offered the client’s predisposition toward low self-regard and responsibility for not having the ability to “keep a man in [her] life, inches the specialist had to be incredibly careful to point out the conceptual difference among understanding scenarios and determining blame. In this regard, the therapist as well suggested and supported the concept something fundamental was incorrect with Carlos as a candidate for long term partnership (i. e. marriage) simply by virtue of his resistance to the theory after to become father inside the fourth 12 months of an close relationship that were mutually fulfilling up to that point. The client finally came to understand that while she might have reacted differently missing the oppressing fear of parent disapproval, it had been not her fault that Carlos had not been interested in relationship.

The client also came to know that while she has already chosen to forgive Lenny for his infidelity, basically was as well motivated simply by fear of losing him through the fear of parental response to her becoming alone again as the mother of the child. Your woman realized that your woman was not psychologically ready to forgive Lenny. Moreover, she found understand that when she presented the incongruence between her intellectual decision and her emotional response (or state) and the incongruence between her hopes about Lenny as well as the possible fact he shown as a person, she would need to spend more time taking into consideration whether or not the girl could, indeed, forgive him from the perspective of re-establishing trust based upon his suitable that renewed trust. The customer left therapy with a personal commitment to keep a positive self-regard that was as self-employed as possible of parental endorsement, and a commitment to re-evaluate her decision to invest her life with a guy who had been unfaithful to her once.

References

Cepeda, D. M. And Davenport, D. S. “Person-centered therapy and solution-focused quick therapy: An integration of present and future understanding. Psychotherapy: Theory

Research, Practice, Training, Volume. 43, No . 1 (2006): 1-12.

Friedlr, K., Full, M. N., Lloyd, M., and Horder, J. “Randomised controlled assessment of non-directive psychotherapy or routine general-practitioner care. “

The Lancet, Vol. 350, No . 9092 (1997): 1662 – 1665.

Kirschenbaum, L. And Jourdan, a. “The current status of Carl Rogers plus the person-

focused approach. inches Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, Vol.

42, Number 1 (2005): 37-51.

Murdock, N. T. (2008). Theories of Counseling and Psychiatric therapy Textbook. A Case

Approach. Second Edition. Prentice-Hall: New York.

Schmid, P. Farrenheit. “The Features of a Person-Centered Approach to Therapy and Guidance: Criteria to get identity

< Prev post Next post >