reflection about engineering related leadership
The case to be studied consists of an experience I had developed working with a group of Chemical Engineering students in an Overseas Community Involvement Project where we had to construct and install water purification systems for a small town. To make the project more prepared, deadlines to get specific goals of the task were also collection at distinct intervals. During one of the times of the project however , the group had faced severe weather in the morning, causing work getting started only in the afternoon. Naturally i was unsure of whether we could full our duties, which included layering and cementing of walls, as well as the installation of pipes as well as the filters to get the system. To make matters worse, we had to complete these people by the end through the day, as we were expected to support local technical engineers with other unit installation works the following day on the same normal water purification system and they wasn’t able to carry on except if we completed our tasks. In our panic, we attempted rushing our tasks devoid of properly distributing our roles, severely influencing the quality of our construction and installation functions despite doing them. Looking back, we could have discovered ways to job more effectively.
This case study intends to spot which positioning of command from Rottmann et al’s Engineering Management would have been best suited because situation, as well as to question what sort of better knowledge of engineering management and its traits would have assisted us as budding engineers-to-be.
It appears rather obvious that collaborative optimization may have been most appropriate in that condition. As highlighted by Rottmann et al, having an awareness of collaborative optimization would have aided all of us in designing a highly-efficient technique of working, in which all our expertise and talents could be fully utilized and leveraged on. In this case, the matter was a deficiency of direction that resulted in a misallocation of tasks that was ineffective as the entire operation required all facets of it to be completed in conjunction with one another. This may have been prevented, had we done something which we were even more familiar with. For instance , I was even more familiar with the layering and cementing of the walls, yet, I found me personally working on the basin set up instead. Yet , in such a circumstance, a leader who also embodies the concept of collaborative optimization only would not have sufficed.
As stated by Colcleugh, a catalyst-like leader would not only optimize task allowance, but can also serve as a source of determination, potentially raising the spirits of users. If someone amongst all of us had walked up to lead and display these qualities, the team would have possibly experienced a motivational improve towards the goal of completing the development while also being able to completely optimize the efforts by doing familiar jobs such as the layering of wall surfaces that I was more experienced in. This illustrates clearly the effectiveness of a catalytic style of executive leadership through collaborative search engine optimization as it is able to motivate its members to execute even more efficiently. In fact , collaborative optimization could be the most crucial sign of experienced engineering command, being the orientation most closely linked to the ideal engineering leader. As a result, it would seem the absence of collaborative optimization by simply all of us led to an bad display of engineering management which in the event that done better, could have produced the whole procedure more efficient.
By having a much better understanding of the concepts of engineering management, it can also be recognized that there were an absence of effective communication. In accordance to Schell, it is a essential trait of engineering leadership that should be anticipated of anatomist leaders on the market. In fact , one other author, Brent, identifies effective communication to be one of the most remarkably sought-after traits by companies themselves. Powerful communication since an engineering leader is crucial to the achievement of any kind of project because of influence. Through this context, successful communication could have been developed from our interactions, in a way that we familiarized with one another’s technical strengths. To do so , we could have recognized the different areas of construction that members were more proficient in. This trait supports the leadership positioning of collaborative optimization, by aiding the best in his task delegation as its members could have already known how to leveraging on each other’s strengths. If the ideas and information have been relayed far more effectively, each of our construction and installation might have been carried out in a more efficient fashion.
Such cases are imperative inside the development of architectural leaders, because they allow a first-hand connection with how the anatomist leadership may be applied within a given situation. By reflecting on my own engineering related leadership experience, I am able to comprehend the theories better, and understand that leaders are manufactured and not created. Much of my own discussion stressed the importance of collaborative search engine optimization and how rehearsing effective communication and a catalytic design of leadership will be key characteristics of it. Spotting that everyone has their own strong points, would be the particular first step to identifying myself as a great engineering leader.
