terrorist attacks 9 11 essay

Category: Essay topics for students,
Words: 1674 | Published: 04.10.20 | Views: 492 | Download now

The tragedy of September eleven 2001 (9/11) indeed shook the world plus the waves of the quake remain being felt today. The terrorist attacks on the United states caused the greatest death fee in the USA by any unique event since the Civil Conflict. Approximately $3, 000 people were killed like the hijackers, individuals on the industrial jets, patients at the Community Trade Center (WTC) plus the Pentagon. The hijackers targeted the ultimate symbols of US economic and armed service power. Although the physical destruction caused was limited to a national level in the USA, the consequences were genuinely international.

Get essay

The earth Trade Centre was an integral part of the New York financial sector and showed not only American interests but those of additional countries around the globe. The physical collapse from the towers started an economic failure of global amounts. 9/11 not only caused loss for Us citizens but ethnicities of the world.

Terrorism is often thought as unlawful actual or insecure use of push or physical violence by a group or person against persons or real estate with the objective to intimidate or coerce societies or government authorities, often to get ideological or perhaps political factors.

Terrorists and their proponents have cleverly found methods to fund their particular missions. Terrorism is financed by both private and state benefactors. An example of non-public sponsoring is the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the man behind 9/11. The US government provides identified a number of countries that they claim happen to be state sponsors of terrorism including Arab saudi, Cuba, North Korea, Syria and Serbia. Terrorism is likewise financed through money washing and the abuse of no remittance systems like Hawala which are unlicensed and unregulated.

In response to 9/11, then simply newly chosen US Chief executive George W. Bush and his administration pledged to avenge the problems and prevent others by bringing about a war on terrorism. Rose bush warned those countries neglecting to join their very own fight or perhaps those continuing to allow terrorist cells to call home in their nation would be treated as hostile regimes. The aftermath in the attacks and Bush’s require reignited legal reform around the world. Prior to 9/11, there was currently movement toward standardization of anti-terrorism legal guidelines around the world together with the Terrorist Funding Convention of 1994 yet 9/11 added significant momentum to the change. In order to maintain internal protection, promote and restore monetary stability, hastening the enacting of anti terrorism laws was incredibly necessary. The most known of these legislative attempts in preventing and punishing terrorist activity will be those of the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the United Nations. Most of these legislative reactions realize that the most effective way of preventing terrorism is definitely cutting it away at the originate, in other words preventing its financing.

The mass creation of law, changes in banking treatment, and unstable of global overall economy are evidence to support Davis’ supposition that 9/11 a new galvanizing impact on the world. Here the effectiveness and appropriateness of the economical legislative respond to 9/11 will be discussed.

US Response

The US response to September 11 was understandably fast. The USA Patriot Act 2001 and the Usa president Executive Buy 13, 224 were enacted and fixed shortly after the events of 9/11. Both bits of legislation sought to weaken and discover terrorist activity by obstructing acess to the international economic climate.

Presidential Exec Order 13, 224 chosen 27 groupings and individuals as thought terrorists and as a result blocked and froze estate assets. The Order also covers the blocking of possessions belonging to persons and agencies “materially assisting terrorists.

The USA Patriot Act is a extremely controversial bit of legislation which in turn extends the reporting requirements already imposed upon economic and credit institutions further than and which include those define in the Financial Secrecy Act 1970. It obliges finance institutions to file a suspicious activity report (SAR) with FinCEN on transactions falling within prescribed thresholds and when orders result in funds being delivered to or from specially selected groups, persons or locations excluded by simply Presidential Executive Order 13224 or any various other list. Name VIII from the act includes provisions that attempt to stop and discipline activities that appear to support or financial terrorism. In this title, US forfeiture law was prolonged to allow government bodies to grab assets both equally foreign and domestic belonging to any group or person caught conspiring to commit acts of terrorism up against the USA or perhaps its residents. Assets might also be seized if perhaps they have been acquired or preserved for the purposes of financing of terrorist activities.

UN Response

The foreign response to 9/11 was significantly influenced by US although ultimately must be led by UN to be able to obtain a matched and effective level of international cooperation. Just before 9/11 the UN produced the Conference for the Suppression in the Financing of Terrorism which usually incorporated measures aimed at stemming the activity of money belonging to suspected terrorists and served as being a precedent to UN Secureness Council Quality 1373. The resolution imposes 4 obligations on Member States, necessitating that they (a) prevent and control the financing of terrorism; (b) criminalize collection of terrorist money in point out territory; (c) freeze resources of people who terrorize or intend to terrorize.

UK Response

Terrorism is not really a strange danger to the British isles as it has already established to deal with episodes from the Irish Republican Military services (IRA) long before Al Qaeda became an issue. Because of this, the united kingdom had currently implemented anti terrorism guidelines. The Terrorism Act 2000 created five terrorist financial specific offences which include (a) fundraising; (b) use and possession of terrorist purposed money; (c) money arrangements; (d) money laundering and (e) failure to reveal information. Yet , the effectiveness of TAG 2000 have been quite difficult to measure considering that the Government radically changed that after the 9/11 attacks. Soon after the ATCSA 2001 was enacted with the purpose of avoiding the floe of terrorist financing. It enabled the HM Treasury to freeze assets each time a suspicious deal was being investigated and prolonged the grounds pertaining to the processing of SARs. The capabilities of the UK regarding the very cold of possessions and credit reporting requirements will be identical to people of the US yet the ALL OF US comes underneath more fire and critique for their legal response.

Efficiency and Appropriateness

The purpose of a SAR is always to report and offer information for the relevant authority within a particular state, on the transfer, first deposit or withdrawal of money of a particular threshold that qualify as suspicious. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) details the SAR as are “one of the government’s main guns in the battle against cash laundering and also other financial crimes. The purpose of the reports should be to help provide leads intended for initiating money laundering investigations. These are crucial because it is noted that funds laundering is a fantastic and common way of financing illegal activity including terrorism. The tolerance on which countries file SARs are one of a kind to each nation.

However , the potency of SARs has come into issue. It is relatively impossible to muddle through the millions of SARs reported daily or weekly and select the needle from the haystack. Additional humiliation of the SAR took place in the This summer 7 attacks in London where price with the bombs fell way under the SAR threshold at 100 ” 200 pounds.

One more problem facing the effectiveness of fashionable in legislating against terrorist financing is a prevalence of cheap terrorism. Low-cost terrorism identifies terrorist problems whose damage and effects exceeds the price of carrying out the attack. Instances of cheap terrorism include the Bishopsgate bomb in London in 1993 that expense 3000 and caused regarding 1 billion dollars pounds worth of damage. Loretta Napoleoni paperwork that it is will no longer necessary for terrorists to spend huge amounts of money in plotting because they can perform a small assault and make a large amount of hysteria.

The absence of on dirt attack seeing that 9/11 within the USA appears to some, proof of the effectiveness of the brand new legislation criminalizing terrorist loans. It has been a little bit over 6 years since the episodes on the WTC without any even more attacks on US soil. This nevertheless , should not be construed too convincingly as proof of effectiveness with the legislation. An overall total of eight years ended between the 93 attacks around the WTC and the 2001 harm and it should be noted that procedures were integrated to prevent one more bombing following your 1993 strike. Also, also after delivering into push ATCSA 2001, which has related effect and clauses as the USA Patriot Act 2001, the UK nonetheless suffered a great attack about July 7 2006. There seems to be no adequate way in calculating how successful the new measures are in preventing terrorist attacks. The most concrete evidence of effectiveness might perhaps be the record and arrest of terrorists while conspiring or about execute. Certainly an effective ways of legislating might have prevented future attacks.

The appropriateness from the legislative response is also questionable. The US press has presented terrorism an Islamic encounter and hope, detrimentally influencing the belief the Islamic population with the country. ‘Islamophobia’ as it is referred to as, is so prevalent that in a Gallup pole, 40% of american citizens polled stated that they were prejudiced against Muslims and 39% felt that US Muslims should bring special identification. This ethnic profiling expands beyond the media to law enforcement and the blocking of charities benefiting Islamic terroritories. Sadly you cannot find any recourse for individuals or groups unjustly affected by this because the Best Court maintained that ethnicity profiling when done pertaining to reasons of national security is legitimate.


http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/31944.pdf ” midsection east state sponsors


< Prev post Next post >