The Amritsar Massacre Essay
Words: 466 | Published: 01.31.20 | Views: 479 | Download now
Similarly the sources suggest the Amritsar Massacre did create hostility between Indians on the British, with the British federal government being described as repressive and irresponsible. However , the choice view provided by the options is that Indians were not hostile towards the Uk, but they were in fact grateful of their support and did not feel that we were holding repressive. 1 view presented by the resources is that Indians did not like the British rule.
The theme of hostility is usually presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 the British happen to be evilly manned, using strong words just like dishonest and unscrupulous, indicating strong feelings of hostility towards Uk rule, while Gandhi seems as though the British happen to be almost cheating the Indian people with no regard to the would like of the Of india people, which means the Uk are doing what exactly they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This supply shows that the hostility experienced Indians is at fact widespread because it is authored by Gandhi, a person who showed and was supported by a variety of people via all classes.
This concept of the hostility to British can be corroborated in Source 15 where the Uk are described as irresponsible and, like in Origin 11, the Indians truly feel their rights of human beings are staying denied, displaying that the Indians again experienced that the Uk were performing as they delighted without American indian voices getting heard. However , as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was at fact wide-spread Nehru only represents the INCORPORATION which has the high famille community as a significant majority, and as it can be written in 1919, all of us cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year since the massacre itself.
The alternate view presented by the sources is the fact Indians are not in fact aggressive towards the Uk and actually valued British rule. For example , in Source 12 there is no feeling of hatred from the Muslims, as they desired British help: Without British protection we would be entirely oppressed by their (Hindu) majority. As this is drafted in 1931, 12 years after the massacre, this facilitates the view the fact that Indians were not hostile toward Indians and it was certainly not long lasting even though there may have been aggressive attitudes inside the years following a massacre, above 10 years on there is no sense of hatred among the Indians.
However , as this resource is authored by a Muslim, the Indian majority is not really represented at this time source, as there are many other classes and religions which may have inconsistant views.