The complex relationship between George Milton and Lennie Small Essay
Using the book “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck, I shall illustrate just how Steinbeck explores the complicated relationship between George Milton and Lennie Small. Steinbeck’s “Of Mice and Men” deals with the plight of migrant labourers in California during the Great Depression, while using focus on two random migrant workers, George and Lennie. Lennie has been described by simply John Steinbeck as a very easy character who also indulges purity of a tiny boy without him understanding it. Lennie is impetuous, compulsive and instinctive, such as when he refreshments the scummy pond water without even considering. He simply cannot control his own body system movements as they is a half-wit, his physical strength may not be measured or perhaps controlled by him.
He can not what he appears to be, in other words we could say that his physique does not match his personality. Compared to George, Lennie is big, heavy, solid and not intelligent, “Behind him walked his opposite, a big man, shapeless of face, with significant, pale eyes”. He is referred to as any other ordinary person working in the plantation. Many times he doesn’t tend to kill pets that this individual takes care of as they thinks that he is petting it.
A great example is definitely when he can be petting the pup and he by accident kills that. He hides it and tells George that his intention was to take care of it. This tells us that he loves pets and this individual himself doesn’t know how very much harm he is doing for the animal as they doesn’t recognize how strong he’s. He often acts like a kid since usually a little kid gives respect for an elder individual that acts properly with him and treats him within a nice approach. I think George is a very unhappy, because although he provides a constant friend and good friend in Lennie he is of the much higher intelligence level and also needs someone who understands him.
I think this kind of because every thing is different among him and Lennie also their physicality, when John Steinbeck initially describes all of them he says, “The first person was small , quick, darker of encounter, with restless eyes and sharp, good features. All of him was identified: small , good hands, slender arms and a thin and bony nose area. Behind him walked his opposite, a big man, shapeless of face, with significant, pale eyes, with wide, sloping shoulders; and he walked heavily, dragging his feet a bit, the way a bear drags his feet. ” I believe John Steinbeck uses the entire difference in physicality showing their complete difference in character. Right from the beginning of the book you observe that George is the head of the pair.
In fact he’s physically leading Lennie throughout the path at the beginning of the story. He will care for Lennie; he is concerned about him and tries to stop him performing things that are bad for him, like ingesting the scummy pond drinking water before checking out it. He could be also quite aggressive to Lennie, to hold him in check. When George discovers that Lennie has a dead mouse he includes it throughout the pond and is quite tough which makes Lennie cry, “You know god-damn well what.
I want that mouse. ” He instantly regrets it though, when he sees the look of anguish upon Lennie’ deal with and games consoles him slightly. He is operating like a parent; he seems a sense of responsibility for him. Lennie is similar to a small child and fascinated by tiny things such as rats, however he could be too awkward and powerful to be able to take care of them with out killing these people. Almost everyone available has some sort of problem or perhaps disability that prevents all of them from obtaining their goals, and in ways the relationship between George and Lennie is a problem to them both and more too. In the event the relationship destroys (which is inevitable) after that George can be left with no dream, more visits to the whorehouses and the most of all isolation.
Others like Candy will likely suffer a shattered fantasy. George and Lennie anxiously cling to the idea that they are unlike other workers who wander from farm to farm because, in contrast to the others, they have a future every other. But characters just like Crooks and Curley’s wife serve as pointers that George and Lennie are no not the same as anyone who wants some thing of their own. I believe by killing Lennie, George eliminates a big burden and a threat to his own existence (Lennie, naturally , never threatened George immediately, but his actions decreasing in numbers the life of George, who have took responsibility for him).
The disaster is that George, in effect, will shoot equally his partner, who produced him totally different from the different lonely staff, as well as his own dream and acknowledge that it moved hopelessly wrong. His new burden is actually hopelessness, solitude and the lifestyle of the destitute ranch worker.