We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

The implications for the business and stakeholders Essay

Describe the ramifications for the business and stakeholders of a organization operating ethically. In this P2 task, I am explaining the implications that Primark’s underhanded practice has on itself and its individual stakeholders. Let me start of by launching Primark’s six main stakeholders are and I will also describe how all these stakeholders is definitely affective by simply Primark underhanded activities.

Let me now go over how these types of stakeholders are affected efficiently or negatively by Primark’s unethical techniques. Customers: Although Primark generates in Bangladesh and India, their main customer base is Europe. Customers point of view is always to buy products that are cheap along with good quality.

Without the customers, Primark as a business would not endure because in all situations, customers would be the main priority and their requirements have to come first. Customers are vital stakeholders because they will instantly tend to spend their cash on one more company that can turn out to be a competitor for instance , Primark previous customers can start searching at Change. As a result of Primark’s unethical behaviour, customers will certainly benefit within a positive method. The reason why consumers will benefit from Primark’s underhanded behaviour is basically because products will be cheaper to enable them to purchase instead of going to various other clothing stores like Riv Island.

Also this is a benefit to customers since most of Primark’s stores happen to be based and operate in Ireland, U. K as well as Europe and so customers will find it as being a cheaper substitute not knowing that Primark’s staff earn low payment. Residential areas: The community is an important stakeholder pertaining to Primark since they welcome the company for their area and responsible for publicizing within the area. Primark features trust on their community because they are an essential part of the company. The community also helps Primark with marketing has they give a word of mouth about their business and without the community, Primark has no trust.

As a result of Primark’s unethical actions, communities will see it unfavorable to welcome a company just like Primark who’s unethical. The main reason Primark staying unethical can damage residential areas is because a bad image will be building pertaining to representing or perhaps collaborating while using company. Even though it will be positive for europe community as they won’t have to pay for costly clothes since Primark retail it for cheap, it will in a negative way affect the Bangladesh community.

Primark’s unethical actions will impact the Bangladesh community because the majority of the family members would have to work for them because there’s lack of jobs which will mean that to make more cash; children from 3 years old obtain dragged in to the hard work world. Federal government: Government is one of Primark’s stakeholders mainly because they need to see whether or not the business is targeted on their objectives. If Primark is doing very well, it helps the us government as they produce wealth and employment. Primark’s unethical behavior will affect the Government in a negative approach.

The reason for that is because the government is responsible for the businesses within a country and for Primark doing unethical items, it will damage their popularity. An example of why the government popularity will be damage by Primark’s unethical behavior is about their very own treatment of employees. Primark don’t treat their particular workers with all the respect and dignity well deserved and that will impact the Government’s image as they did not issue that problem. Shareholders: A Shareholder is an external stakeholder. Shareholders are part of Primark’s stakeholders because that they possess distinct shares inside the company.

Investors will be afflicted with Primark’s unethical behaviour in a positive approach. The reason for that is the fault Primark offer their product such as: clothing and garments at an affordable price that can attract consumers because they can purchase numerous products understanding that the price is affordable. Primark’s strategy of cheap clothing will also attract customers mainly because they sell large fashion items that consist of stores such as: New Look or perhaps H&M are costly and clients will profit from the good deal which will enhance their sales and the more money that shareholders will be receiving. Suppliers: Suppliers will be stakeholders mainly because they provide the items for Primark that are required to be sold.

Primark’s dishonest behaviour will affect suppliers in a positive and negative way. The main reason their dishonest behaviour is going to heavily impact the suppliers within a negative method is because they will have a poor image as they are also a element of Primark’s manifestation as a firm and people is going to think that the suppliers think it is okay to rehearse unethical types of procedures. Primark’s dishonest behaviour will also affect the suppliers in a great way since the company will be producing funds and the even more profits which come, the better pay that suppliers get for their deliveries.

Trade assemblage: Trade assemblage are stakeholders because the union employs professional staff who are the stakeholders. Trade unions will be impacted by Primark’s dishonest behaviour within a positive and negative method. The reason why Trade unions will be afflicted in a adverse way is because of Bangladesh as Primark’s factory where the production happens is within there plus the workers don’t get the correct treatment because they get paid negative wages as well as the minimum salary is poor. An example is definitely the kids basically get paid 52 pence hourly for their operate. Furthermore, transact unions will be affected by Primark’s unethical behaviour in a positive way because of Europe while Primark’s staff receive great treatment and the respect that they can deserve.

Primark also pays their personnel that work in places like the U. K and Ireland in europe, good wages. Primark’s underhanded behaviour affects Bangladesh’s operate union within a negative approach and the EUROPEAN (Europe) in a positive. Personnel: Employees are part of Primark’s stakeholder because they are one of the reasons how come business keep moving in a ahead direction and are also organised.

With no employees, a small business wouldn’t function. As a result of Primark’s unethical conduct, employees will discover it bad because they are the ones that will affect the many. Primark’s underhanded behaviour can be noticed everywhere as they don’t treat their workers as it should and one of the reasons is pay.

Is very well documented that Primark spend low pay and salaries to their workers and is labeled as unfair treatment. Primark’s unfair treatment due to their dishonest behaviour is going to negatively influence their employees because it will create a negative work place, employees may well leave as a result of unethical behavior affecting them such as: low pay. Let me now explain how Primark’s unethical business activities effect on Primark alone as a company.

Primark has already established a reputation of being underhanded as they pay their personnel little cash and after the disaster in Bangladesh in which a factory that was filled with Primark’s staff collapsed, there’s been a few questioning of their treatment. Since the disaster in Bangladesh, Primark has built a poor image/reputation and that’s poor because it may cause the company an adverse publicity. Primark may not understand it but their unethical behaviour may cause them to loss in money particularly when they carry a expulsion day wherever loads of goods are on sale. The reason for that is the fault customers will not likely want to buy outfits that are made via small kids through the age of three and get money a preposterous amount of money.

In spite of Primark’s dishonest behaviour leading to some customers boycotting against them, you know that they are afflicted with their underhanded behaviour but they don’t attention as they generate profits out of it. I’m now going to make clear how Primark’s seven different stakeholders have different conflict of interests. The seven stakeholders are buyers, employees, suppliers, communities, government, trade assemblage and shareholders.

Employees’ conflict with client positions] will be to get Primark certainly not performing underhanded behaviour because they will not get a good treatment while customers will benefit from the unethical behaviour as they can purchase stylish products to get a cheap price. Suppliers don’t need anything to perform with Primark unethical behavior as their presence and reputation will be affected negatively at the same time, Trade unions will gain from it especially if is the EUROPEAN (Europe) since employees that work in the Primark stores in which they are located across Europe get good treatment and exceptional pay.

Shareholders will find this as an edge for Primark to be dishonest by spending their employees money just like: 52 pence an hour since the finished products will then be people paid a cheap selling price which will create more money for shareholders. Furthermore, communities and government don’t really reap the benefits of Primark becoming unethical. Primark’s unethical conduct will negatively affect the govt because people will probably be thinking that it can be their job to set rules about stuff like this.

Communities will also be negatively affected by Primark’s unethical behaviour because most people that live in a few areas would need to work for Primark’s as they shortage jobs also to earn more money to get survivor, youngsters are forced to work with their families inside the hard work world. General, Primark’s dishonest behaviour benefits some stakeholders and not others.

< Prev post Next post >