the need for intense criminal proper rights reform
liforniaTHE REQUIREMENT FOR EXTREME LEGAL JUSTICE REFORM IN WASHINGTON DC
ORIENTATION
FACTORS:
I. Standard Introduction and description Introduce basic edges of Criminal
Law and Elaborate
2. General History and Development
Go over the history and modifications of Reform Laws in Cal
III. Main Problems and Concern Stimulating drugs
Point out actual life statistics and point out occurrences
IV. Bottom line
Point out the advantages of an extreme reform and what can be done
SENTENCE SUMMARIZE
I. An analysis of Department of Corrections info by the Center on Juvenile and
Criminal Justice in S . fransisco, CA, in Nov, 95 indicates that since the
achievement of Californias Three Hits law couple of years ago, 192 have hit
out for cannabis possession, when compared with 40 intended for murder, 25 for rape, and twenty four
for kidnapping.
A. Excellent strong task for the California Legislatureand that is a
tight and logical reform to the present Criminal Proper rights System in California.
M. The Cal Legislature shall be commended due to its stance about crime. Certainly not
for their obtain tough policies such as the 3 Strikes regulation but for their particular
enactment of any little regarded section of the Penal Code entitled the Community
Based Abuse Act of 1994. (Senator Quentin Kopp, Time Mag Feb 14
1996) C. By passing of this action, the State of California has acknowledged the
limitations of incarceration because both punishment and a deterrent to criminal
patterns. D. The legislature provides in fact announced that Californias criminal
rights system is significantly out of balance in the heavy dependence upon jail
facilities and jails to get punishment as well as its lack of ideal punishment pertaining to
nonviolent offenders and element abusers whom could be efficiently treated in
appropriate, less restrictive courses without any embrace danger towards the
public
II. More information, Opinions and Developmental Ideas
A. In essence, this legislation proposes a residential area based system of intermediate
constraints for non-violent offenders that fall between jail time and
traditional copie such as house detention with electronic monitoring, boot
camps, mandatory community service and victim reimbursement[n]: reparation; indemnity; settlement; compensation; indemnification, day revealing, and
others. B. Pilot programs need to be developed like a collaborative effort between
the state and areas requiring a community based prepare describing the sanctions
and services to become provided. C. A improvement report on an actof this kind would be
made by the Cal Board of Corrections in January you, 1997 and annually
afterwards to chosen legislative committees.
III. Informatives
A. It seems like clear the California Legislature has established that
incarceration is not appropriate for many criminal crimes and that substitute
sanctions will be preferable pertaining to non-violent offenders. (Randy Meyer, Political
Official) B. While this approach shall be applauded, their spreading inhibits
the satisfaction of its true potential. C. By retaining individuals non-violent
offenders that are at present in express prison and continuing to pursue shielding
punishment with the local level in the form of temporary shock incarceration
and bootcamps, the costly and ineffective methods of felony behavior
a static correction remain in one piece. (Charles Calderon-US News) D. By instantly
eliminating incarceration for all nonviolent offenses and requiring victim
compensation and community support, resources could be committed to preventing
crime rather than to the feeding and real estate of offenders. E. This is certainly consistent
with the findings of the legislature and it is cost efficient, requires minimal
systemic change, and increases open public safety and security.
4. The Proposal
A. Each of our current lawbreaker justice system appears to be dependant on the Old
Legs proverb that your attention shall not shame, it will be life for a lifetime, eye
for eye, teeth for dental, hand pertaining to hand, foot for feet. Revenge therefore plays a
part of the treatment model. (LA Official Boland) From a societal standpoint
we anticipate punishment in order to avoid the arrest and others by further criminal
behavior. Incarceration of offenders as the punishment of choice thus
theoretically provides revenge, individual incapacitation, and constraint.
But I actually submit that such a philosophical base is problematic. Revenge while
understandable from an individual human being perspective is usually not a right basis pertaining to
societys respond to the misbehavior of its laws. This kind of human need to punish
should be removed from the current program and replace by methods of
limitations that make use of the offenders potential to benefit his victim and
society at large. In other words, within a free world the end desired is the
static correction of behavior that utilizes minimal force. This kind of conforms to the
principles of limited government, efficiency, reduced cost, and personal liberty
as advocated by both equally liberals and conservatives likewise.
The basic actual concept of this proposal is the fact incarceration should be
reserved for those who find themselves violent and so dangerous towards the public. Violent
crimes might
