We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Use of Language in Waiting for Lefty Essay

Clifford Odet used an array of language methods to convey the differences between the diverse characters, the relationships between different character types, and the attitudes of individual characters. Chinese that the personas use in the play lets us know about their personal details, such a what ‘class’ that they belong to and whether they were educated or not.

Via looking at the character of ‘Joe’ we see that he is of working class and not especially well educated. We know this as he uses a immense amount of colloquialism in his speech, ‘pulluckas’. Also searching at the dialect used in the written text we see just how Odets has tried to convey to the stars how to state certain collection.

For example the figure Joe once again, says, ‘helluva’. In Common English this could be written while, ‘hell of a’. Odets however has written it like this so that the actor knows exactly how to see the line. What are supposed to end up being rushed and squashed together, again an additional sign of Joe’s working class position. Another reason why Odets has chosen to work with language such as the above should be to add an essence of realism to his play.

He wanted to make sure that real persons (working classes) could connect with the concept that he was conveying in his play so therefore he had to speak all their language. Make use of such terminology would have been good to find the audience over a characters area and rounded to their way of thinking. It would make the working category audience aware of the personas.

Odets likewise liked to work with ‘Similes’. ‘Fatt’ was just but a single character that spoke a whole lot of rhetoric language. E. g. ‘out like lions and in just like lambs’. Such phrases gave the audience what you should think about and gave a contrast for the colloquialism as well used.

In addition, it showed which will characters in which better informed than other folks and therefore had been less likely being working course. Odets likewise favoured the utilization of colours in his language. For one justification in the perform ‘Fatt’ says, ‘red and yellow constitutes a dirty colour boys’. The ‘red’, mentioning communists as well as the ‘yellow’ talking about cowards. This use of colors in the vocabulary added to the texture of the piece.

It allowed the audience to believe more deeply by what was actually being said without having to be to demanding on their minds. The use of racist language also shows all of us the unaware attitudes of several people in the 1920’s. Also, it is only the abundant, upper class, pompous characters that the audience are supposed to unlike, involving racist dialect. Perhaps in Clifford Odets cries for a more equivalent society he was also silently calling for the liberation and equal legal rights of blacks and Jews.

In conclusion I think that the colloquial language that Odets used ensured a common contemporary audience whilst the rhetoric dialect allowed for a more educated market member in order to down fundamental meanings at the rear of the text. I have discovered Odets utilization of language equally appropriate and well thought out with this play.

< Prev post Next post >