why can salman rushdie be considered a socrates of
Excerpt by Term Newspaper:
Salman Rushdie: Modern day Socrates from the ‘Global Village’
When the Anglo-Indian writer Salman Rushdie’s debatable novel The Satanic Poems was first published in 1989, the publication ignited an international firestorm, crammed with book burnings, substantial public protests, and even the issuance of the fatwa, or possibly a religious death sentence against Rushdie by simply Iran’s hard-line religious innovator, then-Ayatollah Khomeini. Since then, sixteen years have got past, Rushdie is still surviving, and producing. Since that time, as well, many factions of the Muslim world have found seem, to whole European nations, like the United States and more, fully as intractable as they must have seemed to Rushdie in the past. Within The Satanic Verses, Salman Rushdie dared to ask hard questions regarding such sparsely-discussed issues since the origins of Islam and the foundation the entire Islamic belief program. For many non-Muslims in 1989, the controversy over The Satanic Verses probably seemed equally strange and irrelevant. However , in today’s world, a lot more non-Muslims, particularly in the aftermath in the 911 terrorist attacks, could themselves at this point like answers to their individual questions with what drives Muslim extremists – those same extremists who needed Rushdie’s mind a decade . 5 ago. In 20-20 hindsight, Salman Rushdie is now identifiable as a kind of Socrates of the “global village” of 1898 (and today): originally prior to his amount of time in asking the proper questions, now, well within his element in carrying on, as he does, to do so, still.
In Ancient Athens, the accusers of Socrates (as Socrates himself mused aloud) might have said something like this: “Socrates is guilty of speculating about things far above and much below the earth, making the weaker argument appear the stronger and teaching the ideas to others. ” The moment Socrates then went looking for someone wiser than he, among politicians, poets, and artisans, this individual found that, in the case of a politician known for wisdom, the politician basically had almost no wisdom, yet believed he had a great deal of it. Based on that, Socrates determined:
Well, not of us is aware anything fabulous and great, but We am better off than he could be. He understands nothing but believes that this individual knows, while I neither understand nor think that I know. For this reason I seem
