wikileaks values issues brought up by the execute
Excerpt from Term Paper:
Wikileaks
Ethics issues brought up by the conduct of the American government in dealing with Wikileaks and Assange
The behaviour of the American government to Wikileaks increases serious moral issues related to government intimidation of the personal company. The founder of Wikileaks has additionally experienced significant amounts of harassment because of the Wikileaks scandal which includes called in to question the integrity from the American authorities in chasing justice through means that are inconsistent while using fairness cast the government generally espouses. Lastly the case produces in light moral issues associated with the attempt of the government to interventor free talk and limit the freedom in the press. Most of these issues will be explored in the subsequent talk.
Ethical Concern 1
One of the most blatant ethical issue that is raised with the American Federal government is the method it has eliminated about attempting to dismantle the Wikileaks web page. Instead of getting legitimate and legal methods to ensure that the site is not really releasing details that could be harmful to troops and more, the government has become reduced to attacking this website, so that people cannot see the information being exposed via the internet site. This practice is deceptive and not consistent with the messages of free speech that America constantly espouses. This kind of ethical concern also has legal ramifications, specially if the American governmental is liable for the episodes on the Wikileaks site.
Alternative solution 1
Since this particular ethical issue deals with justice and conflict resolution procedural values should be utilized. Procedural integrity is concerned with ensuring that fairness prevails in a given condition. The American government and a few other governments have showed poor making decisions skills and possess not had a fair and balanced strategy in dealing with Wikileaks as a firm. The American government features resorted to using strategies that may be unlawful when it comes to freedom of speech. The stakeholders happen to be Wikileaks, Armed forces personnel, as well as the government.
Alternative solution 2
Distributive integrity can also be useful to address the actions of Wikileaks. Distributive ethics is targeted on fairness in outcomes. In the event the American authorities is concerned with ensuring that just how it confronts this concerns is good for all stakeholders, this approach should be adopted. The power to tae stakeholders would be that the outcome is not going to cause all the harm as the manner when the situation is currently being dealt with. At the current time the treating Wikileaks implies that there has been several interference together with the ability from the site to carry out its journalistic endeavors. The stakeholders through this situation will be Wikileaks and also other press retailers.
Ethical concern 2
One other ethical concern has been the treatment of Assange by American government as a result of Wikileaks actions. There are plenty of reports that prior to being held in simple confinement the American federal government and her allies were attempting to search for Assange. In addition Assange reports that several employees have been harassed and hunted very much the same. While the American government provides the right to go after people who that they feel have violated what the law states, it must do it in a manner that is lawful and respectful. A superpower performing in ways that mimic vigilantism is unbecoming and contradicts the meaning of rights and justness that American continually espouses.
Alternative solution 1
Deontological Ethics will be helpful to use in this scenario. Deontology asserts “that there are certain things which have been right or wrong intrinsically. We should carry out them or not do them mainly because of the sorts of things they can be, regardless of the outcomes of doing these people. “[footnoteRef: 1] The American government must utilize this idea in managing the situation with Assange. There are right and wrong means of doing whatever. The American government provides chosen the wrong way of dealing with the problems it includes with Assange’s actions. Intended for stakeholders this method would assure humane treatment and might tarnish the and realizing that people have with regards to democratic suggestions about America and her allies. The stakeholders will be Assange, the American authorities and her allies. [1: “deontology. ” The Blackwell Dictionary of Traditional western Philosophy. BUNNIN, NICHOLAS and JIYUAN YU (eds). Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Blackwell Reference Online. 26 March 2011 ]
Alternative answer 2
The conducting of any Cost Gain Analysis will also be attractive this situation. An expense benefit analysis simply répondant what the costs of decisions are relative to the benefits the decisions produce. In the realm of values a cost gain analysis is utilized to make audio decisions.
