stylistic and comparative examination of

Category: Literature,
Words: 1143 | Published: 03.16.20 | Views: 597 | Download now


Get essay

Nothing Platinum Can Stay, Ozymandias

Carpe Diem

Impermanence is usually not an different concept to humanity. All life ages and dies and the material humankind uses to boost life, ends away. Really no impact then that poetry generally touches with this topic since poetry is definitely the artistic interpretation of your life and its events. For example , Ozymandias by Percy Shelley certainly nothing Gold Can easily Stay simply by Robert Frost both represent the idea of impermanence through aspects of rhyme, metaphor, and unnecessary repetition.

Alliteration is often used to generate musicality in poetry. Shelley’s reflective sonnet uses dingdong to not only enhance musicality but to offer a sense of strength towards the bold sculpture of Ozymandias. The composition forces someone to enunciate the line, “Two vast and trunkless legs of rock stand in the desert, inch (Shelley) by emphasizing for the letter “s” and “l”, two gentle letters that, when absence in emphasis, sound like mush. Because they sound like mush when alliterated without emphasis, the reader will enunciate, building a strong impact. Furthermore, Shelley also details the face with the statue while having “cold command” (Shelley). The composition now uses hard “c” which produces stone-like images. This use of alliteration stresses the strength of Ozymandias in order to make compare against the discouraging end with the poem that reveals how even the most effective do not last forever.

Ice uses stabreim to add fluidity to Practically nothing Gold Can Stay. The alliteration inside the poem depends on hard rimant as seen in the 1st line with “Green is usually Gold” (Frost) and then fades into soft consonants because seen with “Her most difficult hue to hold” (Frost) and “So Eden sank¦” (Frost) before returning to a difficult consonant with “Dawn falls to day” (Frost). This might seem like coincidence however the alliteration is used to boost the poem’s sequence, starting and tying up with hard consonants in a package of soft consonants. This very much resembles the changing of nature’s plants as referred to in the poem, reminding someone of the temporary nature of life.

Both equally poets also use metaphor to portray the impermanence of existence. Frost’s first metaphor is mother nature, speaking of the foliage of the leaves and exactly how its “first green can be gold”, also describing that green can be nature’s “hardest hue to hold”. During these two initial two lines, he has introduced a good example of the mercurial state of life in a way that all people can find connection to. However , the poem does stick solely to the a comparison of life and nature. Frost then brings a hint of biblical research in there as well in the line, “So Eden sank to grief. inch Eden is known as a strong metaphor for impetuous life mainly because in this range, Frost is bringing the psychic and impalpable into his description. In the Torah, Eden is a perfect community from which human kind has been players out from because Hersker and Event ate from the tree expertise. To many, Eden is a symbol of a perfect world that changed pertaining to the a whole lot worse and a new that mankind must restore. Frost uses this mention of the strengthen his argument, reminding the reader that even humanity’s sacred emblems of flawlessness are voiced of being non permanent and easily altered.

Shelley, incongruously being the romantic with the two, utilizes a much more straight-forward and cold metaphor intended for the ephemeral state of existence. The narrator tells of a figurine of a full in the middle of the desert. The statue’s subject matter appears to be daring and solid and the base it stands on states, “My term is Ozymandias, king of kings, look on my functions ye mighty and despair! ” This kind of statue is definitely supposedly proof of a grand town that has vanished as Shelley then procedes describe that “Nothing close to remains. inches And that aside from the statue that tells of “mighty works” and two “vast and trunkless legs of stone, inch there is only the desert. Shelley uses this ruin as evidence of the temporary state of not only the living, once powerful, Ozymandias, but the materials as well through his explanation of the lone statue and exactly how it is the simply evidence of the city that was previously. The poem furthermore will remind the reader, through Ozymandias’ striking declaration of “mighty works” that absolutely nothing lasts forever no matter how strong it is in the time its bloom.

Even Shelley’s rhyme structure tells of momentary existence through its inconsistent pattern. When Frost’s rhyme pattern in Nothing Gold Can Stay appears to be more for the fluidity in the poem than the portrayal of ephemerality, Ozymandias starts with a rhyme structure which improvements from best rhyme to subtle fifty percent rhyme before staggering returning to a perfect vocally mimic eachother in the end. This kind of idea of recycling where possible word style is also observed in Frost’s poem. However , although Frost uses alliteration to resemble nature, Shelley echoes of gentleman and material, reminding the reader that the foliage of leaves is not the only lifestyle that repeats in various methods. Shelley addresses of the ruin of Ozymandias’ civilization yet through recycling his rhyme scheme inside the poem, can be he not hinting at the relevance on this ruin to civilization today? While autorité and countries of the world appear to thrive today as though they may last forever, Shelley reminds his readers that everything is impermanent. Ozymandias thought his city might last forever great it is just marked lifeless land. Most likely through rhyme, Shelley foretells a future the place that the nations thriving today will be nothing more than desert. As abnormal as this might be, Ozymandias could possibly be more than useful about the temporary point out of lifestyle. Perhaps Shelley reminds his readers to become grateful so that is in the present for in the foreseeable future, it may not be there being appreciated.

Maybe neither poet person writes on the ephemerality of existence to generate one truly feel gloomy but for point out concentrate on many make of taking the present for granted. Shelley and Ice, though diverse in style and century, speak on the same matter. However , there exists a possibility why these poems are not to be seen in a morbid light but in a great uplifting lumination instead. Hiding behind the blunt fact of living remains a moral lesson of appreciation that Shelley and Ice both represent through distinct uses of the same literary components. Life is ephemeral and therefore, humankind must appreciate it in the moment instead of complaining about how it will not previous. Carpe Diem!

< Prev post Next post >